this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
0 points (50.0% liked)

General Discussion

12067 readers
68 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


πŸͺ† About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: [email protected]!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!


πŸ’¬ Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with β€˜silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to [email protected] or [email protected] communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No, it doesn't. First, changing constitution would be impossible. Two, even if you did all this it would just make right wing states get even more extreme (there's nothing in the plan that would let central government protect human and constitutional rights in red states).

Unfortunately US political system wasn't designed in a way that let's it change with time. To introduce big reforms like this it would pretty much have to collapse and be rebuild from scratch. Realistic way to make things better is simply organizing locally to inform/educate people about progressive/socialist policies, electing moderate/progressive politicians to take over Democratic party and simply creating a political force that can actually oppose Republicans instead of trying to comprise all the time.

No so long ago it was generally accepted that Republicans will always be a minority party. They managed to take over the government though smart PR, well organized (dis)information campaigns and long term, bottom-up work to take over institutions. Now Democrats have to do the same.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (7 children)

Abolish senate and scotus? Wtf is this?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Income tax and senate are important.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (19 children)

Fuck the Senate and giving representation unequally.

Why the fuck do CA and WY get the same representation in the Senate other than because some old slave owners pitched a fit about not having power over more populated states.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

The Senate makes sense under two circumstances:

  1. The US is a confederation, with the majority of the sovereignty resting with individual states rather than the Federal government, and
  2. Senators are appointed by state legislatures and not directly elected, giving them a meaningfully different constituency and perspective than House reps.

Those circumstances existed when the Senate was initially conceived of by the founding fathers, but no longer do.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

It really isn't possible to abolish the Supreme Court without undoing the constitution entirely. You do that, and you aren't fixing things, you're starting over. And yeah, in theory you could amend the constitution to do it, but trying to make that happen is the same as undoing it in reality.

I'm not saying that's an invalid choice (viva la revolution!), I'm just saying that it is a different concept entirely.

But yeah, if you just changed the first one on that list (which could be done without drastic measures), it would fix 90% of the rest.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Where do you get the money for UBI if income tax is abolished?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Land value tax, also popularly known as georgism.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Where do they get the money for the military budget?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Just so you know, the rest of us grudge our income tax, but pay it because of the massive benefit to us and others less fortunate

The answer is abolishing income tax below a certain threshold, and raising it above certain thresholds

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Leave income tax (VAT is useful but ultimately a regressive tax in that it relies on consumption and therefore disproportionately affects the poor).

Leave the Supreme Court but add term limits-I like 13 years because it keeps the chances that any one person will be able to transform the court very small.

Add in universal pre-k and post-secondary education. Pre-k in particular benefits society at large because it teaches children how to interact with peers in an equitable fashion.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes yes no no yes yes yes no

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

*Undo citizens united

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (3 children)

No. What kind of crazy shit is this?
Income tax is one of the only tools that could be used to combat inequality

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Here, if you'd actually like to learn why income tax doesn't work and why it disproportionately impacts the poorest workers: https://www.propublica.org/article/the-secret-irs-files-trove-of-never-before-seen-records-reveal-how-the-wealthiest-avoid-income-tax

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

This is incredibly misleading. I thought propublica was better than this. They calculated these billionaires β€œtrue tax rates” based on unrealized gains. Until they cash out they don’t actually make the money.

You can argue for higher income tax brackets, or a more progressive capital gains ladder, or regulations in banking stopping rich people from using other peoples money based on equity they have or any number of way more complicated things that aren’t income related, but outside of just a wealth tax which is something entirely different, these true tax rate numbers are nonsense.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Capital gains taxes and graduated lending taxes would do far more to combat wealth inequality than income tax ever could

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I'd just like to give a shout-out to estate tax, which is the only kind of tax that has the explicit purpose of preventing the establishment of an aristocracy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

You must not understand how the rich make money. Unfortunate, hopefully you learn some day.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So you're not really asking if your plan makes sense, you're trying to force what you think on others. You'll learn one day.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

I'm not forcing anything on anyone, I'm just bringing up things they don't like to hear.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Only if you want to maintain the capitalist status quo by making sure the population is just comfortable enough not to turn on those few who actually benefit from it, while the rest of us scramble for these kinds of bare minimum, not even all-our-human-rights-being-met scraps, some even thanking our overlords for their generosity as they ~~piss~~ trickle down all over us.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • Star Voting
  • Voting is a national federal holiday
  • Universal mail in voting
  • UBI
  • Medicare for all And things start getting better from there.
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Why does voting day need to be a holiday if you can mail it in

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

To reduce barriers to voting.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

How is it being a holiday or not a barrier if you can just mail it?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

And to make it more fun and increase involvement. It should be a huge celebration β€” not something that feels like doing your taxes.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

I probably should have added UBI to the list. Maybe I'll make an updated list in the future when I spend some more time doing research. Just read about STAR voting and I still think ranked choice is simpler and better.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (5 children)

The supreme court should probably be a random selection of judges from the lower courts, rather than a set of jerks. Maybe they serve a short term, or are selected for each case.

Not sure why abolishing income tax is on here. That's usually a right wing fever dream.

There's other stuff that would probably help, too.

  • Enforce monopoly laws.
  • Break up existing orgs that are too much.
  • Nationalize ISPs.
  • Do.. something.. about police. Just don't let it devolve into outright private police. Probably need to unbundle all the responsibilities the police currently have into separate institutions, increase licensing requirements, increase accountability. I don't have a fully baked answer, but if the state doesn't provide an answer for "Someone broke into my house" then the private market will, and that's probably going to be worse.
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Income tax disproportionately impacts blue collar workers and the wealthy just avoid them, our tax system is designed to fuck working Americans. https://www.propublica.org/article/the-secret-irs-files-trove-of-never-before-seen-records-reveal-how-the-wealthiest-avoid-income-tax

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

This was an interesting read.

Sounds like we need a wealth tax and to tax unrealized gains

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

I agree, the anti-trust laws have been butchered and Citizens United v. FEC fucked everything up.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

a good start re: Police - nationalize training standards, ROE, and accountability nationwide, and prohibit police unions.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I like the idea of 18 year staggered terms offset by 2 years. Each president gets to nominate 2 justices each presidential term. It needs something to prevent the Senate from essentially saying β€œno” to every nominee like McConnell did, but it’s better than lifetime appointments.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

We can thank the fucked system for allowing the orange reality TV show star to appoint 3 of the 9 current supreme court justices.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)
  • Yes.
  • Yes.
  • Basically because influence in the senate isn't scaled by population? I can get behind that. Any other reasons?
  • Why? (Aside from that it's stuffed with Trump appointees and insurrectionists right now, I mean.)
  • Hadn't heard of this before, but what little I'm seeing about it sounds good.
  • Obviously.
  • I'm definitely not up on this one.
  • Maybe, but only if we introduce something else that'll have rich people actually paying taxes (for real). Otherwise, reform income tax.

And ones you've neglected:

  • Abolish corporate personhood
  • Wealth tax
  • UBI
  • Constitutionally-protected reproductive rights
  • Abolish 2A
  • Abolish private prisons
  • Abolish forced labor

And if we're allowed to include things probably well outside the Overton Window:

  • Abolish private property, prison, cops, military, borders, employment, the profit motive, corporations
  • To each according to need

That's just off the top of my head.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Abolish corporate personhood

This to me is a big one.

One big issue in bigger corporations is how the C-suite execs are inherently not being held responsible for any damages caused by their decisions, as due to the raw size of the company, these happen too late, and they can take a golden parachute and go to the next company to focus on shortest-term gains, raise stock prices, then get bonuses based on that.

But, a few things can be done to improve that, and requiring companies to have someone legally be responsible for the shit happening under them would be a huge step. Personal accountability. Either be responsible as the CEO, or have a legal document that delineates which issues fall under whose manager's umbrella.

I'd go a step further and make C-suites / management with profit sharing or stock-based bonuses also automatically lose money for losses in said performances, even after they leave the company, based on the percentage of money they were responsible for (You worked there 12y ago to 8y ago, you were the CEO so 100% responsibility, company now lost 6 mil, you have to pay back bonuses based on 2 millions "performance").

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

VAT is regressive, disproportionally taxing those who have to spend more of their income.

An income tax with a wide untaxed bracket and steeper rates for higher brackets would be more equitable.

The Supreme Court serves a purpose, but is being coopted by political interests and effectively controlled by the Senate, so changes are needed (e.g. eliminating the Senate, moving to elections, setting term limits).

Everything else is reasonable and necessary for a functioning democracy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

VAT can be tailored to not include certain staple items. It can focus frivolous purchases like private jets, yachts, etc.

load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί