this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
1457 points (99.3% liked)

Work Reform

10137 readers
51 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Reminder that the Christian Labour Action Coalition is not a union even if they say they are.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Unless you live in a "Right to Work" state, then you get to benefit from the work of unions without contributing any money to their efforts, much like a leech benefits from the blood production of the animal it attaches itself to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not exactly, you will receive the prevailing wage, but not the full benefits package. No thanks to right to work, it's a big pile of bullshit too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Right to work is a way to hurt unions by starving them of dues.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

I think the comparison to a leech is accurate, as the leech does not know or understand it is a bloodsucking parasite, but continues to steal blood and nutrients, those ignorant of the work unions perform will benefit from them regardless of their contribution.

Rarely do you find someone who both genuinely understands what a union is for and declines to join when offered the opportunity.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

I mean, they'll probably get you more than your dues cost, by a lot... So, there's that...

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

at my job, you are covered by the union whether you pay dues or not

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

How does that work? Wouldn’t a lot of people just not bother paying?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Some countries are like that. There are pros and cons to it though. The unions are stronger when people bother joining.

Also, being covered by an agreement at your work is only part of what unions offer. They have other services for members, like getting your salary checked, legal support, salary insurance, various discounts for stuff, etc.

It might be tempting to save the membership fee, but don't be a leech. Someone worked hard to get the benefits for everyone. Join the union.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

i was a part of the union for several years, went to meetings and voted and everything. unfortunately i became disabled and the amount of medical bills etc became so overwhelming i had to cut everything i could. since i was still covered by the union, i had to make that choice for me, even tho it bothers me. I'm not a leech, just in an unfortunate financial position currently. $40 is a lot for some people, especially if they have mouths to feed :(

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The anti-union Americans have a vacuum between their ears and enjoy 3rd World working conditions. F-them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Can we get refugee status in your country?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What bothers me most about unions is the increased bargaining power labour gets when they work together. As a manager, my employer expects me to use every trick possible to pay those actually making the company run as little as possible and unions make it much harder to get my bonuses.

But I use one neat trick and pay the employees the money that then gets directed to running the union as a deduction from their paycheck and many of them don't even notice that the difference in overall take-home because of that increased bargaining power is higher than the union dues. They focus on the nickels and dimes and don't even notice the dollars!

And the fact that I need to meet certain criteria before I can fire them due to the union contact doesn't even show up on the paycheck--they often don't even think about it until it's too late!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Omg no /s you must be an evil manager

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Why doesn't she tell them to work as chimney sweepers?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's such a laughably bad "unions bad" take. If there was such a thing as a kind of insurance where they fight to keep you employed, people would probably sign up and pay the fees.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This should be illegal to the point that whoever is responsible for this tweet should be jailed for st least 5 years.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Except the king of disinformation bought Twitter. And “we” not only keep using it en masse, but basically elected him as president.

I dunno about the rest of the world, but the US is way past the event horizon, and the chance of ever arresting people like this is less than zero.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This whole election is nuts. RFK Jr. is gonna gut the FDA and NIH so they have to outsource more and draw more lawsuits which will feed his own stupid advocacy firm, or he'll switch his company over to consulting and score millions more by outsourcing the FDA to his own workers. And Elon is obviously going to benefit himself. And Trump is gonna wreak havoc on the economy in the long run with his tariffs if he's being serious, and his border policies are a disaster... this isn't going to go well.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the whole point is to kill the FDA and NIH

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

yeah that's what I just said. and its a bad idea. if you believe the government is inefficient, you don't just fire everyone lol. you work on a granular level to incentivize efficiency through policy adjustments.

The fact they're just planning on firing everyone is proof they're not interested in helping Americans. They just want to strain federal agencies to a point they have to outsource even more than they do. This way, these people retain power vai consultant firms etc. long after they step out of office.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If Amazon paid someone/company to do this, then it definitely is illegal. But likely no jail for anyone, just minor fines chocked up to the "cost of doing business"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, no, that should be jail time for whoever sighed off on this.

Make a few examples and people will very quickly stop signing off on shit like this

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

And people will lap this up as a genuine Amazon worker. Disgusting.

load more comments
view more: next ›