this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
292 points (94.5% liked)

politics

19244 readers
1760 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

President Joe Biden pardoned his son Hunter Biden, prompting strong backlash from Republicans.

GOP lawmakers criticized the move as an abuse of power and an attempt to avoid accountability, with figures like Rep. James Comer and Sen. Chuck Grassley calling it hypocritical and corrupt.

Biden defended the pardon, citing “selective prosecution” and claiming Hunter was unfairly targeted due to their family connection.

Hunter faced convictions for federal gun and tax charges.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Biden had all the justification he needed when Trump indicated he'd target his political opponents if he won.

Anyone complaining about this can fuck off.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (5 children)

He should pardon himself for everything before he leaves office so Maga can't drum up some stupid made up thing to tie up his last years.

Or resign so Kamala can in the last day if he can't.

Use trumps political retribution statement as the reason.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 90 points 3 weeks ago

These two posts on my front page right beside each other.

Get fucked Republicans. You have no moral high ground here.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

Aww fuck those one way princesses.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Definitely a bad look but in all honesty it’s justified.

The right was definitely unfairly targeting Hunter. They were using him as a scapegoat since they couldn’t get to Joe.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

stay mad ~~libs~~ repubs 😎😎😎

am i doing this right

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 weeks ago

everyone was mad

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Republicans are faux angry. They clearly don't really care about the deed at all. If anything they're gleeful because they get to run around and call Biden a nepotistic liar.

Some Democrats are angry because Biden just handed the Republican a stinky turd that they're going to throw in our face every time someone brings up any of their lies or nepotism.

Many Democrats don't seem to care either, as long as Trump is worse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago

And, nobody cares if the Reich Wingers fume about this. Literally, nobody.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The only people allowed to be outraged on this are Democrats. The Republican party lost their right to be angry about this kinda stupid stuff shortly after they elected a rapist.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

... and someone who did the exact same thing.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago

I'd argue he pardoned way worse people.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I really don't think giving the head of state the power to pardon is a very good idea. I used to be totally baffled how it was a thing at all but the rationale has since been explained to me. While I sorta get it, the theoretical benefit is far outweighed by the inevitable grimy reality. Like others, probably mostly because of my own biases, I find it hard to summon a great deal of outrage about this understandable if blatantly hypocritical move after so much prior abuse of the lower had already occurred, but frankly if the option weren't even there then nobody would even need to talk about this. If the justice system of the nation is supposedly well designed and theoretically trustworthy then there isn't the need to have the ability for it to be arbitrarily overrulled in a manner that operates very much like the monarchical tyrants the United States was supposedly foundationally opposed to.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Its a check on the judicial branch, by the executive. Thats why.

Sadly, there's very few checks on the executive branch. And fewer every day, given the SCOTUS.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If an incoming fascist government were promising retribution for their political opponents, and if there were threats, however fringe, of public executions, I would also pardon my child. I'm honestly surprised more high profile people aren't leaving the country. Though I guess that would be a bad move on multiple levels. What did that one article say? Don't bend the knee until there's a memo saying you have to?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Also it's probably easier to have them killed outside the country. The CIA and Mossad operate with impunity.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Fumes a party that endorsed a convicted felon for presidency.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Fumes a party that endorsed a convicted felon for presidency.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Fuck 'em. Let them fume. This is the party that wants to let the terrorists from Jan 6 off with a pardon. The party that thinks donvict can do no wrong.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I'll bet the Jan 6 pardons are quietly forgotten. They were a bunch of useful idiots who have already played their role and can be safely disposed of.

Only exception might be anyone who could be potentially squeezed for more information that might lead to more evidence against Trump, but even that's probably a non-issue for him.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if he didn't pardon them.

Not only does he have a history of throwing basically everyone in the universe under the bus, but it's his second term. He doesn't have to please anyone now.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›