this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
315 points (97.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

9939 readers
400 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Daylighting, which involves removing parked cars from around crosswalks in order to improve visibility and just wiped out about 14,000 street parking spaces, has proved especially controversial.

“If someone doesn’t die because of it, we will never know, while the living have to suffer,” Nina Geneson Otis wrote in an email to The Standard. The real estate broker said daylighting is the kind of policy that makes Democrats lose elections.

Others say the city’s actions remove responsibility from pedestrians to look out for their own safety. “A pedestrian can do anything, and be irresponsible, and no harm will come to them?” Brandi said, describing the policies as “idiot-proof.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Lmao. No. Where I live drivers have no problem going right though the crosswalks while people are in them.

I thought they were going to talk about the people who cross at random places, wearing dark clothing, at night. But no they chose to complain about the people crossing correctly who get harassed by cars.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nina Geneson Otis wrote in an email to The Standard. The real estate broker said daylighting is the kind of policy that makes Democrats lose elections.

Urbaninsm, like climate change, shouldn't be a political issue but oddly is. I wonder who could be behind it all?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Is this what we are going to do now, anything remotely good say "things like that is why Dems lose elections" as we watch people and our planet die.

Cool. This is great.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago (3 children)

“If someone doesn’t die because of it, we will never know, while the living have to suffer,” Nina Geneson Otis wrote in an email to The Standard. The real estate broker said daylighting is the kind of policy that makes Democrats lose elections.

The fuck? Is parking at the corners of intersections legal in the US then? Because where I live it isn't for that exact same reason of it blocking visibility. And I'm sure she's suffering deeply for lacking a few parking spots... Dumb entitled cunt.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

It's legal in many places. My city is just now starting to enforce corner parking.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I don't think she's complaining. She is making the very good point that the benefit of the bill is invisible, while the downsides are visible. Making policy decisions based on what's right instead of what's marketable makes a party unpopular because the electorate is dumb and shortsighted.

FWIW, it's not allowed in Chicago but people tend to use the space for short-term parking and pulling over. The city has started blocking the road surface near corners to make this impossible, both with curb bump outs and simple flexible reflective posts.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I think they recently passed a bill to make it illegal, but it won't be enforced till sometime next year.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The most braindead article ever...

"People die from leopards attacks, leopards say people should be more careful"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

I mean, there are plenty of warnings and advice on how to do things like hike through bear or cougar country. Someone who gets mauled trying to pet a bear cub isn't going to get much sympathy.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, an argument that would fly over their heads is that this "daylighting" rule is in place in more than half of the world.

So maybe there’s a good reason ?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's such a common-sense rule that it'd never occurred to me that such a developped country wouldn't have it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

America's more of a developed company than it is a developed country, and the CEOs don't work for the employees.

[–] [email protected] 90 points 1 month ago (2 children)

“If someone doesn’t die because of it, we will never know, while the living have to suffer” is such a wild thing to say oh my god. Yeah, thats the point. Less people die because of it.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

“If someone doesn’t die because of it, we will never know, while the living have to suffer"

Man, I could not have done a better job of distilling the effects of the toxic "rugged individualism" ingrained in American culture down to a single sentence...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

absolutely. Individualism is gonna be the death of us all at this rate

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Especially after we all saw what they mean by the living "having to suffer," during COVID. The "suffering" of having to wear a mask. The "suffering" of maybe getting a perfectly safe vaccine in order to protect yourself and others (including people you don't know and will never meet, wow imagine that)...

But hey, it means that I don't have to pay for some homeless person's health care through my income tax, so worth it amirite?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago

She’s an estate agent. What do you expect?

load more comments
view more: next ›