this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2024
526 points (94.4% liked)

196

16801 readers
1874 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 month ago (3 children)

5, but it also depends on the circumstances. What liquid is used, temperature, viscosity, etc. There's some material science stuff that's far beyond the intended scope of this question.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I got it! First, the free floating faucet will drop into bucket one. The impact will certainly break its connecting tube and broken 1 + faucet collapse into 4. Therefore 4 will be broken but full of shards.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Wouldn't scale and viscosity play a role? Seriously, imagine a river vs a capillary tube. Also how many dimensions? And forces involved? Is that a blockage between 2 and 3? Are the walls breakable? How will the fluid hold air? Are the lines into structure 5 lower than the walls? Is this in a vacuum?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

There is no mention of any fluid involved, just a faucet. So lets think inside of the box and assume we have some form of 2d-gravity and it is going to rain a newtonian fluid? I think most surface area on the top is draining into 5. If it snows the whole sheet can turn white and the problem is gone, too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Also, these structures are all 2 dimensional.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

you may be overthinking it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

We'll done.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

It's a sad day. They all stay empty. Such a loss.

[–] [email protected] 103 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (4 children)

The actual joke aside, 4 has a hole in it, so it won't.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

5 fills from 2, not 4.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Oh yeah, I got so losst

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

??? 4 and 5 are not connected

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Doh, you're right, not sure what I was thinking.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Cheers, I got you bro.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Depends on how fast the liquid is flowing in.

Or, actually, can they even "fill"? These are 2D objects.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is this that "loss" comic? Why is everyone mad?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

this is right. Even if 2 to 3 is open.

The only other candidate is 1. If the faucet has much higher flow than the pipe from 1 to 2 can drain away, then 1 can fill up faster than it drains.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

5 is correct but this is a loss leader.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›