this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
58 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19244 readers
1760 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

The congressionally mandated agreement allows transition aides to work with federal agencies and access non-public information and gives a green light to government workers to talk to the transition team.

...

Transition aides must sign statements that they have no financial positions that could pose a conflict of interest before they receive access to non-public federal information.

I'm sure none of them would ever lie about that /s

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That picture may be the only time I've seen them both smile and it's genuinely terrifying.

Biden just really doesn't give a fuck. Dude spent over a decade complaining about how Republicans didn't want to be his friend anymore, apparently all he had to do was refuse to hold any of them accountable, and now it's all fucking chuckles again.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

This guy lol
Are you sure these people are US politians?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago

Didn't a report say years ago almost 50% of the republicans in office in Washington were more or less directly or indirectly compromised by Russian influence?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago (3 children)

"But Trump has declined to sign a separate agreement with the General Services Administration that would have given his team access to secure government offices and email accounts, in part because it would require that the president-elect limit contributions to $5,000 and reveal who is donating to his transition effort....

.....Trump’s team on Friday formally told the GSA that they would not utilize the government office space blocks from the White House reserved for their use, or government email accounts, phones and computers during the transition.

The White House said it does not agree with Trump’s decision to forgo support from the GSA, but is working on alternate ways to get Trump appointees the information they need without jeopardizing national security. Federal agencies are receiving guidance on Tuesday on how to share sensitive information with the Trump team without jeopardizing national security or non-public information....For instance, agencies may require in-person meetings and document reviews since the Trump team has declined to shift to using secure phones and computers."

Other reporting indicates that they will still not be using the FBI to conduct background checks on potential nominees.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

So, lets see if I get this straight:

The non-government offices, physically located elsewhere, will receive classified documents. After which no one knows, nor is responsible for, what happens to them.

A new Mar a Lago situation, just now with less legal hassle and finger pointing ....

Oh yes, Trump did say he wanted to move the "government" away from under the eyes of Washington...

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Other reporting indicates that they will still not be using the FBI to conduct background checks on potential nominees.

Who are they using? The KGB?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago

Of course not, that'd be ridiculous.

It's called the FSB nowadays.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago

That's what you call a rhetorical question, right? The kind that you already know the answer to?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Trump’s team on Friday formally told the GSA that they would not utilize... ...government email accounts, phones and computers during the transition.

But her emails?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

We all know that was just an excuse. No one actually cared about the substance.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

The entire thing is ridiculous. And it's all a-ok with everyone in the government.