Can't infiltrate the willing.
this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
126 points (98.5% liked)
politics
19103 readers
3493 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Project 2025 IS the Trump administration
“The policies are coming from inside the house!”
"infiltrating" lol wtf
Vance wrong the forward to the book!
Like milk infiltrating a bowl of cereal.
More like cereal infiltrating your bowl of cereal after being poured out of an unlabeled clear bag.
"You're never gonna believe this, but someone snuck Cheerios into my bowl while I was pouring from this sack! The container wasn't labeled, so I couldn't possibly have known what was inside, despite it being plainly visible and entirely out in the open"
Apparently there are some heathens who use water instead of milk. I'd say this is more like blood infiltrating your heart.
The lactose intolerant enjoy cereal too.
If we're going to get pedandic, blood infiltration of the heart is a medical condition, usually called infiltrative cardiomyopathy. So you're correct that the metaphor is better, but the literal meaning could be confusing.
I like the cereal bowl analogy because cereal is ostensibly its own thing. But practically speaking, you'd be silly to assume it won't be consumed with milk. Like it could be, but the box advertises it with milk, and the commercials suggest adding milk, and everything about the cereal implies you're going to add milk. Adding water would make you the weirdo, and assuming other people would add water would be absurd. Like suggesting Trump would make an attempt to build a bipartisan coalition. If that's what you're expecting, you're not in touch with the reality we all share.
Water to a sponge? That might have the same issue since infiltration is still a thing, so maybe we avoid fluids for the analogy. Fans infiltrating the stadium? Clothes infiltrating a laundry basket? Now I'm just saying things I see around me. Let's workshop it independently and come back in a week with ideas. No rush, we will have four years of this bullshit.
Infiltrating makes it sound like it's something that is being done in secret and no one expected as opposed to being the plan from the beginning.
Anyone who said that Project 2025 wasn't something to be afraid of, that it was simply a boogeyman that they made you be afraid of but is nothing important, should be fucking ashamed of themselves.
Shame is dead, they were just lying.
Its not infiltrating, it always was the agenda.
And welcomed with open arms...