this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
504 points (99.6% liked)

Greentext

4452 readers
418 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Damm i always thought it was the best star trek ever made

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

I remember watching DS9 back in the 90s. I didn't see it as a bad show. Not sure why people hate it. But then again... I haven't seen any of it since the 90s...

[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 days ago (1 children)

DS9 was probably the most interesting of the shows of that time though. It broke several of Roddenberry’s rules:

  • plenty of characters had long-running interpersonal gripes and grievances. In TNG everything was returned to status quo after any given episode or two parter. No one really argued with each other, everyone just learned a life lesson and everything was back to normal the next episode. Voyager started with some tension on the ship between the Maquis and the federation crew but that basically stopped after like 5 episodes and it was back to TNG camaraderie.
  • it wasn’t on a ship that went travelled about.
  • it had long running storylines that lasted several seasons. TNG had a few two parters and that season 1 conspiracy thread with the creepy crawlies taking over the federation but not much beyond that. Voyager had Species 8472 and the Borg and Kazon and whatnot but it was pretty straight adventure of the week stuff most of the time.
  • it showed the federation being less than perfect. The federation of DS9 was flawed and made poor decisions at times. Sisko did something so bad once that they dedicated a whole episode to a log entry where he convinces himself he can live with the amoral decision he made to protect the federation, and Section 31 was a whole unit purpose made for dirty work.
  • it had Garak. Dude would just straight up murder people, and he was one of the good guys.
  • they played baseball. Not blurgball or space-baseball, just straight baseball. It was a shit show of a game, mind you, but they didn’t invent some futuristic sport just because they had to. They just did a baseball.

I think DS9 is the most interesting Trek series of them all.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (3 children)

should i start on ds9 or is that a terrible idea

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

Yes. Start with TNG, it establishes that era of Trek. DS9 is very much a spin-off.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

I watched it this year for the first time. Got a bit slow at points but I enjoyed it.

For context I much preferred Babylon 5 back in the day as it had big story arcs.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It’s difficult for me to answer in an unbiased way because I grew up watching the shows during their original run and I generally watch one or two of the series runs each year. I watched TOS earlier this year and am presently part way through VOY. Did TNG last Christmas, might do DS9 this Christmas. I’ve got history with these here shows.

It might be better to watch TNG first to see what Roddenberry was going for and see how he set the Star Trek “rules” so to speak before you see how they were broken in DS9 as that might have more impact. TNG might seem a little quaint after watching DS9.

As for Voyager… VOY is effectively an alt-TNG and not really distinguishable but also not offensive if you throw out the space salamanders and similarly horrid episodes. VOY started with the premise of being a series about a ship on its own trying to get home and having to deal with limited resources and always scrambling for fuel and water or whatever, but that sense of desperation lasted about 3 episodes before it reverted to TNG Part 2. It could have really been something but they didn’t have the guts to push any boundaries. Battlestar Galactica 2004 feels like that concept done correctly before it kind of went off the rails when they forgot what show they started with, but I digress.

I think you’d appreciate DS9 more by letting TNG set the stage. DS9 also primarily occurs chronologically after TNG for the most part, with some overlap in the early seasons, although that barely makes a difference in the narrative. Watch TNG for the vision, watch DS9 for the vision rearranged, and bear in mind that these are 30 year old shows before CGI was common place. There will be some racism and sexism in the early TNG episodes and the VFX will be spotty, but these are classics for a reason.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

DS9 is very clearly a direct spin-off of TNG, which was basically a soft reboot of the franchise. I don't see how this is a difficult question.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Does anybody srsly not take it for granted that when Bonespurs says anything it just means he thought of saying it right then?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

Are you having a stroke?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I'll die on the hill that ds9 wasn't bad. It wasn't the best, lowest of the 4.. but if ds9 was the worst and it's still good than the other shows are great

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Um, DS9 is the best one of the 90s. Voyager is easily the worst.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

I liked them the same, but I could name more episodes that I enjoyed and Voyager than DS9

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

lowest of the 4

by "the 4" do you mean TOS through VOY, or TNG though ENT? 🤔

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

I agree. But in general ranking TV series or episodes or characters or arguing that one of them was the best or worst never seems worthwhile to me.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

Weird, I had the opposite experience. I tried to watch DS9 recently and found it so dumb by about the middle of season four I gave up.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Why is that PNG file 1.3 MB? Is it huge or just unoptimized? Is someone using it as a fullsize Quark poster or something?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

PNG is lossless and its compression not well suited for photos. It doesn't even have to be huge to get a photo PNG of that size.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

It's not TIFF. This isn't NASA imagery. PNGs do alright on compression for photos.

(at least I hope NASA hasn't captured images of Quark)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

TIFF is also such a hot mess when it comes to picking the correct subformat because there are so many options for compression available, some of them FOSS, some of them proprietary. Edit: … and most of them quite dated.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

PNG can zip but it's lossless, joh can lose data, and the difference is very significant

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How would you make a lossy PNG? Just introduce errors randomly? That makes no sense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

By reading google or the wiki

Process data so DEFLATE works more efficiently

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Are we still talking about PNG? Nowhere in the PNG standard is a description of changing the actual content of an image to make it compress better with DEFLATE. If you are thinking about the filter stage you should know that in this context an image filter is just creating a different representation of the same image, because it is fully reversible.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Sounds very pedantic. ive already given the only answer im gonna give, if you want to label it something different that's your business.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago

Quark is wise

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I still refuse to believe Starfleet's go-to drink is caffeine-free.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Root beer was just an example of what hoomans like that seems bizarre to other species. If we're talking DS9 I'd say the go-to drink was all the caffeinated raktajino everyone was pounding

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Honorable mention to Tarkalean tea

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

What about my comment implied I didn't realize that? Anyways, Raktajino was also consumed a lot on Voyager. Its strange that Quark focused on Root Beer in light of all the other stuff people drink, other than, hey, this is the only carbonated thing they drink that's not caffinated or alcoholic ... but that wouldn't be true either?

He did say "Starfleet" drink a lot of it, not "humans", so maybe it is just that pupular with Vulcans, Andorians, Tellerites, etc.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Maybe they have Barq's. It's caffeinated root beer.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

They don't even drink alcohol. What makes you think they allow caffeine?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Picard has actual earth produced wine from his family's own ancient vineyard in stock. They usually just don't drink alcohol unless it's a special occasion, but synthol has the same effect, it just wears off faster, so people can drink within 4 hours of a shift.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Kaboom, wrong about everything as usual.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Kaboom is the person you corrected. That's thier name.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

"there's coffee in that nebula"

They clearly allow it, whether or not most partake is another matter. I'm also not familiar with anything saying they don't allow alcohol, just that synthetic is a widely used alternative

[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Admiral Janeway, please calm down.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

I'm still smarting from the betrayal that is Diet Barq's

load more comments
view more: next ›