this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
203 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3308 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump has launched a series of legal actions against major news outlets, including the New York Times, CBS News, and the Washington Post, demanding billions in damages for alleged defamatory coverage.

A letter from Trump’s attorney accuses the Times of engaging in “industrial-scale libel” and targets articles scrutinizing Trump’s business and political conduct.

Legal complaints have also been filed over CBS’s alleged pro-Kamala Harris edits and Washington Post articles purportedly aiding her campaign.

Legal experts warn that such litigation could have a “chilling effect” on journalism, especially for smaller outlets.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 hours ago

I wonder if they think the bOtHsIdEs coverage was worth it....

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

But they repeatedly promised while campaigning that they are the party of free speech! Surely they didn’t just lie to my face??

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago

They are for freezed peach like the Nazis are for "peace" - if there is no opposition, those in agreement (and are the "right" kind of people) can have all the free speech and peace they want.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

There is a razor sharp golden sword that will be wielded against the government called the First Amendment. Fuck off orange pumpkin!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 13 hours ago

When the idiots have captured essentially every branch of the government there’s no one left who will bother enforcing the constitution against themselves.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

A few observations:

  • This won't be the first time those media outlets have been sued for libel. It's a common enough occurrence that they keep lawyers around ready to litigate. So this isn't as chilling as Trump might hope.
  • Litigation means discovery. If Trump wants to win, he'll have to turn over his private records to NYT lawyers. If he refuses then his case will be thrown out.
  • Once Trump takes office, it will be harder to pull this kind of crap. Only private individuals can sue for defamation, the government cannot.
[–] [email protected] 33 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

They will make it legal for government to not only sue but prosecute and jail journalists. Fascist playbook.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

Yeah, this is the bunch that would like to see people like Jack Smith murdered for merely doing their jobs.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 12 hours ago

Yeah, I'm not sure why people expect his administration to follow the established rules.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Cry, bitch.

Edit: Bitch == Trump

[–] [email protected] -1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Sorry, I'm talking about Trump. I'm saying he should cry and that he's a bitch.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago

Ahh, that makes more sense

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago

Well, this feels a lot like Hungary.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Washington Post? Wasn’t Bezos licking your orange taint by silencing his editorial department enough of a payoff?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

Nothing is ever enough.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Bye bye first amendment rights!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 22 hours ago

Only when it's negatively reporting on obese oompa-loompa.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

And the conversion to authoritarianism is entering the final stages.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Final stages? I think you might be surprised how much worse things can/will get.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I look at it as "the beginning of the end." It's crossing the event horizon in a black hole.

The GOP has successfully created an alternate fictional reality for the majority of voters, but once free press has been suppressed, there can't be competing realities. There's almost certainly no going back because the state propaganda at that point is the only game in town, and no oppositional narrative can take hold.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

This is just a frivolous lawsuit. Its unusual for a president elect to file one, but its nothing unprecedented. When the first reporters start falling out of windows, that will be the beginning of the end.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago

No, its just we won't be converting then. We will BE an authoritarian nation when everything gets much worse.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

They already normalized your hate and idiocy, you mad they called you out on the Opinion pages?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

Agreed. The fact that he's butthurt about milquetoast things like NYT says a lot.