this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
741 points (98.3% liked)

Programmer Humor

32469 readers
753 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

You forgot to mention that they will let you use it for cheap until everyone got used to it and then crank up the price by 500%

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

Because it can't be turned into a service

[–] [email protected] 37 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I've actually found a lot of the smaller foss tools I use are better than their proprietary counterparts because of the design philosophy and that people don't cut as many corners on passion projects as when they're on a deadline

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

For real. I just spent a decade in academia working dog hours with little pay keeping services running wondering how the true devs and sysadmins do it.

I recently switched to the corporate world and have peeked behind curtain of competency: headless chickens running around, patching failing products rather than spending time to properly fix them because immediate results are the only metric that counts.

Stability, scalability, reproducibility? Forget it, that's someone else's problem apparently.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Late stage capitalism.

The issue is that capitalism fundamentally requires forward thinkers and enlightened (or at least rational) perspective to function sustainably.

But capitalism rewards short term thinking, everywhere from corporate leadership, to the workforce, to the consumers caught by ads designed to catch and hold their ever-shortening attention spans.

Fundamentally, it needs regulation to thrive. The true cost of a purchase, including environmental and decommissioning/disposal costs must be tied to the initial purchase value. Through this, we might get a functional capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

80/20

I live by this rule, it made me gain so much credibility and money from people who don’t know any better. 80/20 <3

20 percent of work nets you 80 percent of result (except no one knows what I did isn’t 100 percent) bam 4/5 of time saved. Everyone is happy and if something doesn’t work we can just blame it on client

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago

I follow the 80/20 rule recursively. as soon as I've gotten 80% of the way there for 20% effort I immediately stop, and start a brand new project for the remaining 20%. Bam! 96% complete for only 24% effort.

taps forehead

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

.. that depends on this FOSS app.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"Dear floss4life,

Our developers have encountered an issue while using the open source framework you published on github. We have lost as many as 400 user accounts. The estimated cost of this error is $6800.

This is unacceptable. Be a professional and fix it immediately.

Chad Elkowitz, MBA, Gruvbert and sons Finance Lt"

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's why the no warranty clause is by far the most important in any license granting access to the public

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

And it’s also why many companies refuse to use open software. It baffles me that no insurance company saw this as a market opportunity to sell open source software insurance.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

Star designers and engineers don't do Open Source? 🥺

load more comments
view more: next ›