NATO needs to be disolved
this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
48 points (96.2% liked)
politics
19096 readers
3240 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
backers of the alliance are taking comfort in a year-old U.S. law that says he can’t withdraw unless Congress approves.
Legal experts warn that Trump could try to sidestep Congress’s NATO guardrail, citing presidential authority over foreign policy — an approach he used before to bypass congressional restrictions on treaty withdrawal.
Either way sounds easy, isn't it? He has Congress.
The Law? lol, Trump doesn't follow the law, the law follows Trump then bends itself in knots to accommodate and absolve him, and then 10 more million Americans that voted for him last time, vote for him this time, and he wins every Swing state, and Republicans wrest control of the Senate. The Law.
The law doesn't matter. These dongs are going to do whatever they want, and dare the DoJ that they control to do anything about it.
Even if DoJ tries to do something about it, it still doesn't matter. Delay, delay, delay; do more crimes; thumb nose at the world.
It's over. Prepare to resist.
With Putin running free of the defense of Europe the US can provide, the conflicts will be wider and more bloody. Tough to turn, should we ever decide to do so.
Sure, that law isn't airtight. Really, though, what's a law but a piece of paper when there's a SCOTUS decision effectively making POTUS king and Congress unwilling to stop him. At this point, are even so-called airtight laws safe from transgression? I think it's doubtful.
Yup, the fact that the court cases against him for things that have been fully confirmed by the law to be factual and grounded in reality are just going away because the president can't be touched more or less confirms it.
The law can be fully broken whenever there's enough nationalist energy going against it. And the US has voted to fully give in to the high of that nationalism.