this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
449 points (97.5% liked)

politics

19127 readers
4486 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

CNN put out a statement and Abby Philip released a clip:

https://x.com/abbydphillip/status/1851104454247903688

Girdusky is doubling down saying it was a joke:

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago

The important thing is that we remain civil and use inclusive language while we discuss whether or not an entire population including children, non combatants, and international aid workers should be stripped of human rights and murdered.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago

Can't believe a fascist would say this. So crazy.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I'm a little surprised CNN fired him. They got bought out by shitheads and it's sole purpose now is to masquerade as news while being the thinnest end of the wedge for nazi conservative bullshit.

This guy's tactical mistake was forgetting to be gentlemanly and news anchorly about it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

CNN loves mainstreaming guys like Tucker Carlson, Glenn Beck, and Eric Erickson to collect the wingnut welfare checks that come with them.

It's only when they start costing more than they bring in that they get cut loose. Then they roll out new "respectable" conservative front men to replace the old ones.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

"Clown wanders into news room and is upset that they placed a 'no clowns' sign outside after throwing him out"

[–] [email protected] 18 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It's just a joke.

Then go be a racist comedian at a Trump rally.

People are trying to discuss things.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t feel that Tony is a racist. Does he make racist jokes yes. Is he known for this yes. So having him come on as a speaker you should already be aware of what will come out of his mouth. And if you have a problem with what he might say maybe don’t have him as a guest speaker.

Also while his joke has gotten the lime light it was not the most concerning thing said at that rally. Because once again he is a roast comedian, while the others on that stage said things that should be heard as well because of how worrying they are.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 hours ago

Hey hold on a moment. He's not a racist, he's just a guy who has made it his identity to say racist things, which other people (who are also definitely not racist) enjoy laughing at!

You are delusional.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

This article is terrible. It doesn't mention that the beeper attack was a terrorist attack that killed and injured numerous civilians, including women and children.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago

It doesn’t mention that the beeper attack was a terrorist attack

CNN anchors were practically bragging about how surgical and sophisticated the act was when it occurred. Nevermind the collateral damage, it's actually incredibly cool when you circulate bombs through a civil population in an effort to cripple one Iranian diplomat.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
  1. This wasn't what this article was about, so it doesn't need to take a position on the pager attack itself.
  2. This article links to articles about the pager attack that fills in all the details you claim were missing, you just have to read (hard, I know).

I feel like every time there's a story posted that's even tangentially related to Israel, there's some Lemmy user in the comments ready to complain that the article wasn't written with their preferred anti-Israel slant...

At some point, we just have to accept that you're complainIng for the sake of complaining, not for the sake of adding anything to the conversation. You seem more interested in being heard signalling virtue than actually saying something of value.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

There's a whole pullquote describing the beeper attack, and it doesn't even include the word "terrorist"

Its not a slant to describe a terrorist attack as a terrorist attack. Its called being objective and reporting facts.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 20 hours ago

Lol. What a little bitch

[–] [email protected] 31 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Girdusky responded, “You’re called an anti-Semite more than anyone at this table.”

Hasan replied, “Yeah, by you.”

Girdusky fired back, “I never called you an anti-Semite.”

Buddy, you just did

[–] [email protected] 4 points 15 hours ago

Never. Stop. Lying.

As long as you keep getting platformed, some number of people will eventually believe you.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 21 hours ago

“Just joking” is the sorry-not-sorry of the fascist world.

[–] [email protected] 100 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Note that Girdusky is listed as one of the board of advisors of American Moment which is a group that's listed by the Heritage Foundation as a Project 2025 partner

[–] [email protected] 8 points 17 hours ago

I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.

load more comments
view more: next ›