this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
217 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

58885 readers
3659 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Original Link.

More info.

In July 2024, ANI filed a lawsuit against Wikimedia Foundation in the Delhi High Court — claiming to have been defamed in its article on Wikipedia — and sought ₹2 crore (US$240,000) in damages. At the time of the suit's filing, the Wikipedia article about ANI said the news agency had "been accused of having served as a propaganda tool for the incumbent central government, distributing materials from a vast network of fake news websites, and misreporting events on multiple occasions". The filing accused Wikipedia of publishing "false and defamatory content with the malicious intent of tarnishing the news agency's reputation, and aimed to discredit its goodwill".

On 5 September, the Court threatened to hold Wikimedia guilty of contempt for failing to disclose information about the editors who had made changes to the article and warned that Wikipedia might be blocked in India upon further non-compliance. The judge on the case stated "If you don't like India, please don't work in India... We will ask government to block your site". In response, Wikimedia emphasized that the information in the article was supported by multiple reliable secondary sources. Justice Manmohan said "I think nothing can be worse for a news agency than to be called a puppet of an intelligence agency, stooge of the government. If that is true, the credibility goes."

On 21 October, the Wikimedia Foundation suspended access to the article for Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation due to an order from the court.

all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 hour ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asian_News_International_vs._Wikimedia_Foundation

wtf??????????

Why would they even bother to comply, India has no jurisdiction. Plenty of countries have banned wikipedia pages and the entire site before, why did wikimedia have to go out of their way to do it for them globally?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 hours ago

Hahaha go ahead and block it you dumb fucks, only your citizenry will suffer.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago

@Dot How incredibly disappointing.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Blocking an article worldwide based on the orders of a single oppressive regime? That settles it, Wikipedia is no longer worth donating to, since they've proven they're willing to bow to this type of thing rather than stand behind the truth.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 hours ago

I think nothing can be worse for a news agency than to be called a puppet of an intelligence agency, stooge of the government. If that is true, the credibility goes

So close and yet still missing the point. It's not that wikipedia says it, it's that it's the truth, and we can't have website showing true facts, something this judge no doubt understands very well (or at least his wallet does)

Frack all of these people, I'm so tired about a few authoritarian narcissists making the world a shit show.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I would expect something like this from my mother country sooner than India. Surprised but not that surprised. The precedent being set is concerning.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 hours ago

The precedent was years ago with Facebook and WhatsApp blocking alleged anti government messages (which the court branded as anti-nation, sedition). Last year the BBC documentary about Modi and alleged fascism was world news and led to the departure of BBC from India. The problem is that the world sees India as an emerging market where in fact it is a fascist country in the making.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 hours ago

This is pretty big news, I would think it would be relevant in way more than just one article, time to do some updating.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Why not allow India to block Wikipedia? Or have a filter that hides Indians dark secrets, when coming from India.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago

Because it's the government of india that wants to block wikipedia for Indian citizens.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 hours ago

Somehow it doesn't surprise me that India wants to ban free flipping knowledge

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 hours ago

So, lemme get this straight: Wikipedia is being censored (worldwide, might I add) because a party complains that they are reported of as being accused of a thing, or because of the thing itself?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 hours ago

if this 👇 happened in France, than of course that 👆 can happen in India

The DCRI summoned a Wikipedia volunteer in their offices on April 4th [2013]. This volunteer, which was one of those having access to the tools that allow the deletion of pages, was forced to delete the article while in the DCRI offices, on the understanding that he would have been held in custody and prosecuted if he did not comply. Under pressure, he had no other choice than to delete the article, despite explaining to the DCRI this is not how Wikipedia works. He warned the other sysops that trying to undelete the article would engage their responsibility before the law. This volunteer had no link with that article, having never edited it and not even knowing of its existence before entering the DCRI offices. He was chosen and summoned because he was easily identifiable, given his regular promotional actions of Wikipedia and Wikimedia projects in France.

source

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 hours ago

Seems like a good opportunity to remind folks about the Kiwix project, which allows you to download local private copies of select information such as Wikipedia. It was originally created to provide offline access to content for countries that were otherwise blocked, but events like this have sparked some recent discussion about archiving older files to preserve history.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

WTF, If wikipedia get blocked in my country. Then, I am just graduating to leave my shitty country.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You should leave anyway if you have a chance. Germany looking for 70.000 skilled Indians.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

Germany wants the immigrant but i don't think young germans want that. Look at the recent rise of AFD among young germans. Maybe they need immigrants so when the economy goes down they can blame it on immigrants

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

the list of countries you will be leaving is long ☞ https://sh.itjust.works/post/27190154

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 63 points 11 hours ago

Me, viewing banned Wikipedia articles:

[–] [email protected] 37 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

I don't know what exactly is blocked worldwde, but in the frenche Wikipedia here, while the description is short, it's here and extremely explicit:

[ANI] est pointée comme une « fabrique de fake news », un canal de désinformation proche du gouvernement indien4, dont les articles citent pour décrédibiliser les rivaux du pays de prétendus experts inventés de toutes pièces in other words, '{the ANI news agency] is considered a fake news factory and a deinformation channel close to the government whose papers use to quote invented fake experts to de-credibilize rival countries' Couldn't be clearer (and unbanned)...

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

from that page i can switch to English ☞ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asian_News_International

In July 2024, ANI filed a lawsuit against Wikimedia Foundation in the Delhi High Court — claiming to have been defamed in its article on Wikipedia — and sought ₹2 crore (US$240,000) in damages. At the time of the suit's filing, the Wikipedia article about ANI said the news agency had "been accused of having served as a propaganda tool for the incumbent central government, distributing materials from a vast network of fake news websites, and misreporting events on multiple occasions". The filing accused Wikipedia of publishing "false and defamatory content with the malicious intent of tarnishing the news agency's reputation, and aimed to discredit its goodwill".

On 5 September, the Court threatened to hold Wikimedia guilty of contempt for failing to disclose information about the editors who had made changes to the article and warned that Wikipedia might be blocked in India upon further non-compliance. The judge on the case stated "If you don't like India, please don't work in India... We will ask government to block your site". In response, Wikimedia emphasized that the information in the article was supported by multiple reliable secondary sources. Justice Manmohan said "I think nothing can be worse for a news agency than to be called a puppet of an intelligence agency, stooge of the government. If that is true, the credibility goes."

On 21 October, the Wikimedia Foundation suspended access to the article for Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation due to an order from the court.

which is what's quoted by OP

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago

Damn corps always getting away with stuff. They should fine them as a percentage of profit ….😉

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

you did not leave soace betweenthe quote and your message after it, and clients see it as a whole quote

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 hours ago

You mean between the French article and the English comment? :)

[–] [email protected] 31 points 11 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago

modi modi modi modi modi modi modi modi modi modi modi modi

[–] [email protected] 26 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Fuck all abusive government

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

Don’t threaten me with a good time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

This right here. Let's not single out India, there's a lot of shitheel governments to go around.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 hours ago

The article is about India.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 hours ago

It's the country named in the article lmao

[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 hours ago

Fake news got its feelz hurt

[–] [email protected] 117 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck the Indian state and its enablers.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 9 hours ago

Yeah. India is pretty much a piece of shit country. Their government seems really corrupt and they pollute like mad while they still have so much of their busted caste system in place. All while being racist as hell.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

How can they block this for everyone?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 hours ago

it's more of a blackmail. Wikipedia could have kept the article online for everybody but they would have deprived 1,5 billion people in India of the whole Wikipedia.

The judge on the case stated "If you don't like India, please don't work in India... We will ask government to block your site".

On 21 October, the Wikimedia Foundation suspended access to the article for Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation due to an order from the court.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Also, how can they sue a company based in another country.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 hours ago

i'm guessing that it must be like Xitter in Brazil. If a company is present in a country, they may require a legal representation which can be held accountable.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Orginal Wikipedia Page.

The Wikimedia Foundation has suspended access to this page due to an order by the Delhi High Court, without prejudice to the Foundation's rights. We are pursuing all available legal options.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

This just makes me want to see it more.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

Yeah, you know there's bound to be some juicy drama if they want to remove it so bad.