this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
312 points (99.1% liked)

Political Memes

5376 readers
2965 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Are they gonna lock him up in a house and provide food

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 hours ago

Really, how does this play out in states that made homelessness illegal? Like healthcare in America it's another example of our leader's stubbornness that makes our problems worse and more expensive. I guess that's the price of "owning the libs"

[–] [email protected] 24 points 14 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 hours ago

Just buy a home.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 13 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 17 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The liberal party in Germany is tossing the idea around that recipients of social security shouldn’t get their actual rent paid (within reasonable limits), but just a flat rate. This is supposed to allow them the decision to cough up more money of their own for a better apartment or to downsize and have more money to spare.

Given the housing prices, I think we’ll have quite a rise in homeless’ wealth, should this ever get through parliament.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I think so long as: —

a) it's based on the average rent for the area,

b) they give everyone at least 3 months' notice, and

c) there's extra help for those struggling to find cheaper (and reasonable) accommodation (including footing extra to cover their current rent if necessary)

then I think it could work. I'm open to having my mind changed though.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Under the current system, recipients of social security get their rent paid according to an allowed flat size (e.g. 60m² for two people) and the regional average rent. Now “Lindner [head of the liberal party] wants to save billions using the new approach.” “Recipients should not get their rent covered based on the actual cost, but via a flat rate.” (paraphrased from https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/innenpolitik/lindner-buergergeld-ukrainer-100.html; German).

You can guess how well that will go with

it’s based on the average rent for the area,

and

there’s extra help for those struggling to find cheaper […] accommodation

Lindner is famous for his (paraphrased) statement “the markets will solve this”. Rents have skyrocketed just like anywhere else. Now he doesn’t want to regulate the housing market, but wants to regulate the spending on those who already can’t afford housing. It’s disgusting.