this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
55 points (100.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6623 readers
510 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This one is super old and still references Reddit. A kind soul tried making a custom banner for us a while back, but I didn't get much feedback when I posted about it so I just left things as they are and procrastination took over. I need help. I have zero artistic ability, and suck this sort of thing.

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The current community rules require sourcing images used in art; Rule 8. Note that images from the US federal and state governments -- which include a lot of official military images -- are very commonly in the public domain and can be freely used. The Department of Defense explicitly places imagery without specific restrictions in the public domain.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

The crowd over at [email protected] generates images constantly, so if you're up for an AI-generated image -- which might permit for something with a more-cohesive feel than an image montage, might cross-post there to ask for submissions, get stuff maybe more like this:

The existing banner appears to be a montage of images that were previously posted to /r/NCD. Like, the Democracy is Non-Negotiable image appears to be a rescaled version of this:

https://old.reddit.com/r/NonCredibleDefense/comments/yifpm6/3000_blatant_propaganda_pieces_of/

Could patch together something out of those posts.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No planes without clothes in this one. It's a no from me dawg.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, this is our one chance to be family-friendly before being banned for something or other. This grease trap dweller under the Pentagon votes "modestly clothed".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Why would a plane need clothes? You ever seen an F16 wearing pants? Get outta here with that shiz

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

🎶 One of us, one of us, gibble gabble, one of us, gibble gabble 🎶

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I prefer the old one over anything ai generated tbh

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Well, it sounds like the existing one's changing. You willing and able to hand-create and contribute something worthwhile yourself? If you've got a personal objection to generated images, that'd be a constructive way to provide a viable alternative.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You probably want to list your desired resolution.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Look, I already told you I suck at this (I'll find out)

Edit: 960x240, 4:1 ratio appears to be right answer

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

at least a 5/10 if you want to be half way decent

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

960x240 is what one post said

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

investigates

In my web browser, browsing the lemmy.today Web UI, looking at the homepage for the community, if I take a screenshot, the current banner appears to be displayed at 966x129; the actual underlying image is 4,000x533.

Looking at a different community's banner [email protected], I get 966x240 visible in a screenshot, with the underlying image being 1,792x672.

So at least on my browser and viewed on that Lemmy frontend, I'm a little suspicious -- without looking at the code -- that 966 might be some kind of native target for width. It can clearly handle higher-res, and that might be desirable for some higher-resolution displays or clients, if they leverage that.

EDIT: Man, this should be on some kind of Lemmy community moderation wiki. Like, every moderator shouldn't have to individually figure this out.

EDIT2: One reference to 960x240 that I can find is here, though as I said, it doesn't appear to be quite right for native display resolution -- on my browser, maybe just something wonky with me -- and in that post, they point out that different themes can take advantage of higher resolution.

EDIT3: In the CSS, at least in the current default Lemmy Web UI, it looks like .banner has a max-height attribute of 240px, so I think that it's safe to say that at least in that environment, it won't grow past that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The Lemmy mobile apps probably also handle banners differently

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I will zap you with my zat if you don't have an amazing Cake Day!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Aww thanks, I will indeed!

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Too credible I made my work computer background in ms paint lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

That C-130 needs a shave. Otherwise, 10/10

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Put some planes without clothes on it

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

Give em a little bridal garter on their landing gear

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

T I D D I C E L L S

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Please, I can only be so erect.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I don't think that it'll likely hit that level, but note that sh.itjust.works has an instance rule against pornography (which is certainly not strictly adhered to, probably not even in the past image submissions on this community). But just saying, given that a community banner image is probably higher-profile than a one-off image submission.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)