this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
1193 points (98.1% liked)

United Kingdom

5078 readers
238 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago

from what ive been hearing from the shit going on in the uk, youve been a police state for a while now.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Palestine action? Never heard of them. We support Action for Palestinian.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They could just say I support Palestine and be fine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Fuck you, government. I do not respect your existence, and day by day, am losing respect for the laws you demand we follow. Fuck your rules.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Even if they were trying to use this sort of rule with wholesome intentions, I'm not sure how targeting groups by name instead of deed makes sense. It's like doing a healthy diet by giving up Coca-Cola by name even though Pepsi and RC have the same nutritional profile and availability. Enjoy the Whack-a-mole game!

Taken to its logical conclusion, someone should start a pro-Palestinian squad and call it the Reform Party.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (13 children)

The group in question broke onto an airbase and put a couple of RAF planes out of action. They crossed a red line for the government.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Paint and crowbars. The engines will have to be stripped down and rebuilt.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh boy wait till you hear what the suffragettes were willing to do for another righteous cause, a bit over a century ago. I don't know man, maybe the government should start reexamining its policies if ordinary people among its citizens are willing to start breaking into airbase and damaging their own planes.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

They were willing to commit mass murder in London and Dublin, and to assassinate the Prime Minister. Also deeply keen on removing all Jews from the House of Commons. Things that today would indeed mark them as a terrorist organisation.

Later, Emmeline Pankhurst would found a political party with the aim of requiring all civil servants to prove their racial purity back at least 3 generations, and many of the more prominent members of the WSPU became prominent members of the British fascist movement, several being detained as a precaution during the second European fuss.

As a campaign, the WSPU was an abject failure. It put women’s votes back a decade, and Pankhurst failed to ensure that working class women were excluded from the franchise (she also wanted working class men excluded).

It was only a cataclysm the scale of WWI, and the groundwork of the suffragists working in opposition to the suffragettes, which brought votes for all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like a classic case of both the moderates and the radicals being essential for any real change. The moderates are the hammer and the extremists are the anvil.

Society is like a bar of iron. It's stuck in its shape and resists change. Non-violent moderate protest alone is like a hammer without an anvil. You strike the iron, but the iron ignores the blow. With moderate protest alone, the established powers simply ignore the protests. They bend and duck out of the way and nothing changes. But violent groups serve as the anvil. They hold the powers that be in place and prevent them from ducking away from the hammer blow of the moderates.

Both hammer and anvil are needed. Without the violent extremists, the moderates are simply painted as extremists and ignored. With them, the moderates can actually gain traction. Moderate protest movements don't succeed unless there is also a violent wing. Moderates are only moderate if there is something to moderate against. Without the violent extremists, the moderates will be the ones labeled criminals and arrested, regardless of how extreme their tactics actually are.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›