this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
460 points (98.3% liked)

Science Memes

10760 readers
3312 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/21049862

The only numbers I will ever spell are one and zero, and only when using them as a pronoun, or for emphasis, respectively.

Is there ever a reason to not to use symbols when dealing with numbers? Why would "fourteen whatevers" ever be preferable to "14 whatevers". It's just so much easier to read numbers as symbols, not spelled out.

(Caveat, not including multipliers, like "273 billion").

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

In nineteen ninety eight The Undertaker threw Mankind off Hell In A Cell, and he plummeted 16 ft through an announcer's table.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

**Sixteen feet

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

For manufacturing I've taken to using spelled out numbers when quantities and names both use numbers. Four 4s rather than 4 4s. Makes it harder for someone to speed through an email and get the completey wrong information.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Zero.
One.
Zero.
One.
One.
Zero.
Zero.
One.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

🎶The humans are dead! 🎵

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

looollllllllllllllll you!!!!! 🩷❤️🥰😍🩷

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

That's one way to summarise what that number sequence is tied to.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Next you’re gonna ask me to use actual scientific notation instead of to the most relevant 3 decimal points. I will not use your bullshit centimeters, that’s just 10 mms

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Absolutely, mm > cm all the way. Other than you putting s at the end of mm, we don't take the Lord's (metric) name in vain around here.

I do feel kind of sorry for East Asia though, since their languages seperate at intervals of 10⁴, rather than 10³. The giga and mega prefixes just make no sense there. 1 GW = 10,0000,0000 W and 1 MW = 100,0000.

Language strikes again

Not sure, but perhaps they would prefer a prefix of 10^-4^ rather than mm (10^-3^).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wtf I've never heard of this, what a cursed way to notate large numbers

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

It's not cursed, it's just a different way of grouping. Nothing about grouping in multiples of 10³ is a more natural grouping, were just more used to it.

And I'm pointing out how metric prefixes are actually euro-centric, and that's annoying for them. But there's nothing fundamentally worse about breaking digits in groups of 4, rather than 3

1,000,000,000,000 = 1,0000,0000,0000 (10^12^) [Meme of black and white muscular arms embracing.]

Look up the indian system, now that's actually cursed.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_numbering_system

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

As a mathematician, I refuse to do this.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Stay strong friend 🫡, and don't you let them take your numerals from you

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago

Not just an engineer thing though. Everyone finds it obnoxious.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

"One and eight hundred and fifty two thousandths".

Or

"1.852"

You get to decide what's efficient to communicate a specific value based on the criticality of precision and the format of communication.

Like it or not, but peak-compatibility IS peak-efficiency when it comes to language.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I especially hate what we the Czechs do. We mostly read numbers the same (21 = twenty one), but then once every blue moon some dimwit says 21 like "one and twenty" like he's fucking German or something. German is bad enough, but why do we have to mix it???

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I thought it was french that did that

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

French is even more special.

Tho like I said before, it's not perfectly accurate. In Czech 90 + 2 is the official way, but many people around Prague and closer to Germany do in fact occasionally say 2 + 90.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

1.852 all the way in every single context. I will die on this hill haha

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

We die on that hill together, brother!

load more comments
view more: next ›