this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
199 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

59378 readers
3707 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

better than using coal but it would be even better without those expensive datacenter running the bullshit machines

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

It's not enough to pollute the Internet, it's time to pollute the world with radioactive waste.

That's brilliant!

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

yes, let's use nuclear energy to generate half assed AI assistants, images and videos instead of making clean energy cheaper

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nuclear energy is clean, but I agree this energy should be used for a useful purpose, which would bring down costs.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

that is the point? when big tech monopolizes sources of clean energy, it becomes more expensive (or can not become cheaper at best) because there is less availability

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Every Google search should include an AI answer! Who cares about energy usage, we'll just buy a nuclear power plant!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What is the motive behind this push to ram AI down out throats?

They already have all my emails, photographs. location and browsing data.

What do they gain from providing unreliable information at many times the power use? Or having me ask "write a sincere-sounding thank-you email".

I feel like I'm missing some big revelation that will make it make sense.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I say this as someone that works in AI.

It's all a smoke-screen. It shows that Google (and every other big tech company) is producing super secret, super high tech stuff that should make their shareholders super happy. The reality is that Google and co haven't produced shit for years, have laid off hundreds of thousands of people worldwide, and don't have long term plans to improve outside of enshittifcation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

100%

14 years of gaping monetary policy conditioned Corps to making profits from nearly free debt.

Now they have to actually USE their businesses' capabilities and it turns out they suck at being businesses. MIT calls it a "capability trap."

They're just con men still hoping people will dance to their tune after the music has stopped.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Money.

AI will improve and this will be a multi trillion dollar market. Big tech is in a race to be the biggest.

We don't need it and should be focussing on important things but yay capitalism right?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah but big tech is also the customer. So it doesnt make sense. How will they make money if the only way to do so is to trick other giant tech companies into buying and using your product?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

break up big tech. regulate monopolies before we get the second great depression.

load more comments
view more: next ›