this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18894 readers
3243 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

39 billions is money which could be going to Israel to support their genocide.

Taking it from them and giving it to American education is anti semitic! /s /ADL

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The "I got mine, fuck you" crowd really hates progress.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The student loan interest rates are exuberant, while I support the nullification of times past, I'd also like to see the core issue being taken care of

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trillion dollar budget for the military industrial complex? Money well spent! A single dime spent to help taxpayers? Socialism!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The majority of the federal budget goes to welfare and entitlements. I'm on the "no standing army" side of things, but it doesn't help to propagate incorrect information.

Edit: this is absurd. There's no opinion here: the comment I replied to is factually wrong. You can't dislike facts until they're not true.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you failed to engage with their actual argument, which was that military spending is absurdly high but always univocally supported by everyone in the establishment and increased with every new budget, but that it's an uphill fight to get anything new for people who actually need help.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be fair, I engaged with that portion by pointing out I don't actually believe in standing armies. So defense spending should be close to zero. But, yeah, everyone wants their pork and defense spending is free money to them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You don't believe in standing armies? I'm sorry but you're either 5 years old or incredibly naive.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Imagine there is a group that does everything in it's power to block every positive change there could be.

Imagine further that the same group also does everything in it's power to change every positive thing into a negative.

Now imagine that >48% of people vote for that group.

And finally imagine you in a place like that.

Honestly, unimaginable.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's why it drives me nuts when people get a cynical and say both parties are the same or that your vote doesn't matter. Pay attention to how the different parties vote!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Enlightened centrists are the worst. At least you know what you're getting with republicans.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You know what you're getting with centrists, too: snobby Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Centrists are a different breed though. They’ll agree with you until the part about actually doing something to fix a problem. At that stage, suddenly “now isn’t the right time”, “we can’t afford it”, and “we should focus on incremental change”. Fuck centrists.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why are these assholes so against helping people? These fuckers are nothing but greedy sociopaths.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wilholt's law, "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Aka, "you're not hurting the right people"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.”

― John Kenneth Galbraith

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Sounds like libertarianism TBH.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

conservatives view social hierarchy as a necessity which must be enforced. if you’re at the bottom, you deserve to be there, and if you’re there, you suffer because you deserve it, and because you’re at the bottom, you deserve to suffer. cruelty is the point, and without it, there can’t be the joy of their success.

anything else, to them, is profane and must be fought/destroyed. anyone who tries to climb above their position must be punished.

relevant videos:

The Alt-Right Playbook: Always a Bigger Fish

Endnote 3: The Origins of Conservatism

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A Conservative is someone who can't enjoy their dinner without knowing someone else is hungry