this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
876 points (97.8% liked)

Games

38761 readers
1317 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 70 points 7 months ago (14 children)

Eww extremely embarrassing that they used Windows.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

ITT: people think emulators are only the ones you can download

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (2 children)

In this comment: Someone who is not familiar with the history of Nintendo selling pirated versions of their own games and ripping off pirate emulators then passing them as their own.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Did the terms of the emulators they ripped off allow them to? Not saying it's morally okay.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago

or the history of nintendo falsely claiming that emulation itself was an illegal practice when trying to bully and scare people into submission...

[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago (1 children)

if its under GPL couldn't they be forced to disclose the source code?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Only if they made modifications

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What, where do you get that? Any publicly conveyed copies of gpl-licensed software must make their source code available, and be published under the same license. This is true regardless of modifications.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I could be wrong and I'm more then welcome to being proven that. But wouldn't this be like asking me to redistribute the whole process of running ZSNES on linux? Seems pretty infeasible.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›