this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
1025 points (99.4% liked)

Memes

45661 readers
1517 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Not even kidding, my dad watches YouTube on this smart TV and when an ad pops up he covers his eyes and screams until he finds the mute button. He then keeps covering his eyes until he can fully skip the ads.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Yes, I someones forget how people live.
Disgusting.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Put a pi-hole in my rooter filtering all adds of all webs and apps was the best thing I ever did.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

put a pi-hole in my rooter

Giggity What would be the definition if it was in the urban dictionary?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Allot of my phrases tend to be like this without noticing... Its like a power I think

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

It really is, and I hope you never ever lose that power.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If I'm watching YouTube on my TV, I mute it when anything longer than a 5 second ad comes on. If what I'm watching is less than 10 minutes, I'll just back out and start in again, usually it will come up without the ad, then seek to where I left off. Although oftentimes lately, I'll be watching a 5 minute video, and I'll get 1 minute in and get hit with an unskippable 2 minute ad, I just quit YouTube for the day.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

dude use SmartTube on your smart tv https://github.com/yuliskov/SmartTube
it has adblock + sponsorblock

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I think I tried that once & had trouble getting it installed... Don't remember what kind of trouble though, I suppose I should try it again.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Truly awful

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I remembered a scene of a black mirror episode: if the person looked away the ads will stop until the person watch it again and it's unavoidable ... I wonder if this will be a reality one day

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Please drink a verification can

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yes, the technology to do this is here, and they're just waiting for the consumer to be able to put up with it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They know if they do that people will just disable their cameras or put tape over it like they already do. If they make it so you can't disable the camera without losing functionality then people won't buy the product.

If they try to push it by making a gentleman's agreement with their competitors to make all tvs or phones use camera eye contact during ads well have to have fight back with more ad blockers and such.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean the concept is pretty simple, all they have to do is make whatever the content it is not play without the verification.

Now I do have to say, it does come down to what is the system we do want? We can agree we don't want intrusive ads. We can say that the paid for services are too expensive. But at the end of the day when we refuse to pay for the content, and then bypass the ads, we do leave content creation in a rough spot. We've kind of reached a point where we need a new system. Yet all we seem to do is try and find ways to break the existing one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The problem is that ad revenue brings in more money than subscription models ever can. So they're either super expensive because the company is accustomed to the high profits of ads, OR they inevitably end up slipping ads into the paids versions too.

Youtube has become this venus fly trap where content creators get exploited. They exist on the site solely to draw in viewers to show ads to. YouTube doesn't really care about the content or their creators(they don't care about paying them either since there's endless accounts) their primary function is to sell ads. That's it.

With data harvesting and personalized ads they basically print money for themselves. Now each ad spot will show something different to each person, meaning they are getting paid by multiple(potentially hundreds or thousands) of companies for each available ad location. They don't care if you buy the product because they got paid the second that ad popped up on your screen.

Ad based revenue is creating a huge fucking mess for everyone.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Honestly I disagree... From what I've heard from app developers etc... ads generate far less money than even $1 app sales. Now maybe that's the brokers etc... But there's also a reason why Hulu shut down their purely ad supported tier, and none of the big companies are leaning into that. Only "subscribe and get ads" lower dollar tiers.

I'm no super expert, but I think ads are still very inefficiant ways to make money... the profit per customer is very small even with the most privacy invasive blast you away with everything aspect. I don't claim to be an expert, but it appears to me an ad supported service needs around 100x more users to make the same money as a low cost service. However, in actual userbases it goes closer to 1000x when that offer is on the table.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is why I just set up a media server at home.

It's mine, you can't pump it full of ads. All the media is mine and those companies can go fuck themselves.

Sail those seas folks

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don't worry your TV will just hijack the HDMI signal to inject its own ads

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Not if isn't connected to a network. 😈

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Oh I have had a plex and then jellyfin server for almost 15 years. Yarr mateys

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Reading your reply made me think ... it's possible that implying such technology might help rising Free & Open Source culture more ... given that FOSS apps are usually ad-free and with no tracking

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Honestly the best thing about FOSS is that money isn't driving all the decisions. Most open-source projects are built because the dev just wants to build something cool or useful, or they're trying to solve specific problems. Most individual devs don't really care if their user count goes up every quarter.
Personally I've been maintaining a chrome extension for about 10 years, and it's sat happily with about 7000 users that entire time. I built it because I wanted to use it, and I've declined several offers to buy the extension and monetize it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What's the extension? Advertise to me dammit, I'm intrigued

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's an extension that makes GitHub pages full width: https://github.com/xthexder/wide-github/

Admittedly the usefulness has gone down a little bit in the last couple years now that GitHub themselves have made code diffs and some other things full width by default.

When I first wrote this I had just gotten a giant 4K display at work and was really annoyed I still had to scroll left and right with the page only covering 1/3 of the screen.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago
load more comments
view more: next ›