this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
747 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19097 readers
2897 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

As governor he got his state signed on to the national popular vote interstate compact

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As an Alabamian I dream of the day that my vote actually matters, fuck the electoral college.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago (8 children)

As a Washingtonian I also dream of that. It is ridiculous that only people in states that are kinda purple have their opinions heard.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

Hey hey! Ho ho! The electoral college has got to go!

[–] [email protected] 76 points 1 month ago (3 children)

As a pretty left person who lives in Tennessee, please get rid of it. Anytime I have this conversation with folks on the right, I always point out that there are more Republican voters in California than Texas. That usually gets them to concede.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 month ago

It's a great argument, and incredibly depressing that the only thing that will convince them is that it's also their people are being hurt, not that it's the most fair and just thing to do.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yup, I understand it was meant to give smaller states an equal voice but he GOP weaponized it and now the minority is speaking for the majority. Tell me the system isn't broken when ONE vote in shitty red state Wyoming is equal to TEN THOUSAN VOTES in Blue California?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Just to be clear: Also, "states" don't have a voice, only the people in them. Giving a state a disproportionate voice is exactly as just as it is giving its people a disproportionate voice. When the right uses that argument, it's injustice laundering, it's not a valid concern.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

I'm glad someone is saying it! Stupid ass lines on a map determines who becomes president

[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

ONE CAGE

ONE BELT

ONE CHAMPION

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

MONSTER TRUCK!

[–] [email protected] 207 points 1 month ago (4 children)

California gets 54 electoral votes; Wyoming gets 3.

California has 38.94 million citizens; Wyoming has 0.575 million.

California gets one electoral vote for every 721,110 people. Wyoming gets one for every 191,660. This means that per capita, Wyoming gets 3.76 times as much say in who gets to be the president as California.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And that's even before the bullshit that is swing states.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 91 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Indeed. Scrap electoral college and remove the arbitrary cap on House reps.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don’t forget to implement proportional representation in the House, blow up the senate, and implement ranked choice voting or something similar in all elections

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

remove the arbitrary cap on House reps.

I think thats what they meant?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 96 points 1 month ago

The Electoral College is allowing more an more manipulation from these small states. It is time for that to end. They are holding this country back much too much.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›