this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2024
892 points (98.4% liked)

politics

18898 readers
3123 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

doesn't he like literally never pay debts or fines though? i mean this is for practical purposes useless.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

He's old enough to retire and collect social security. He only does shit because of his own boredom at this point in his life.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And some dingaling supporter has started a GoFundMe to help out the poor guy hit by this very unfair and unjust fine

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

To help Trump or to grift Trumpets and keep the money?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Hard to say for sure, but the lady sounds like a true believer.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

Finally, some freaking consequences

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Could this ruling result in criminal charges or are there already proceedings underway in this matter? I mean, the judge has determined that Trump is personally responsible for fraud amounting to several hundred million dollars, right? Accordingly, he himself is banned from doing business in the state of New York for the next three years, which makes it clear that Trump himself has been found to have committed fraud. But is that all? Fraud on this scale must also be criminally relevant, mustn't it? Or is it really possible in the USA to get off the hook simply by paying a fine, even for such serious criminal misconduct?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

OJ Simpson was found not guilty criminally and guilty civilly. It's a thing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Yes, seems so. But it's really the weirdest thing, i'd say.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Legally, it can be explained quite easily. Civil liability must only rise to the standard of "preponderance of the evidence", meaning something like 'more likely than not'. A criminial conviction however, must rise to the standard of "beyond reasonable doubt". That's the difference.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

I get that. I just don't understand why the public prosecutor's office didn't at least try. But hey, maybe they will later on. I guess we will have to wait and see.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The weirdest thing is the platypus. That mf’er glows under UV.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Damn, that's another level of weird indeed.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Come up with the money or secure a bond within 30 days

Or what? Does anyone think he's actually going to pay?

He's going to Alex Jones it at worst, and at best do the same but smarter.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Does anyone think he's actually going to pay?

Then they seize his assets to cover it. Trump Tower goes to public auction.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Hahahahahaa... ahhh beautiful

load more comments
view more: next ›