this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
943 points (97.7% liked)

Science Memes

11021 readers
3607 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

One thing that happened is that I see AI spam farms less and less on some platforms, others are started to refusing to label theirs as such on art platforms like Pixiv, to have a wider reach (they get immediately blocked and mass reported by normal people).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Friendly reminder that my AI-generated image detector is available to use free of charge here: https://huggingface.co/spaces/umm-maybe/sdxl-detector

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Frankly, it sucks. Every input image I tried had over 90% artificial rating.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

If you don't mind, I'd be interested to see the images you used. The broad validation tests I've done suggest 80-90% accuracy in general, but there are some specific categories (anime, for example) on which it performs kinda poorly. If your test samples have something in common it would be good to know so I can work on a fix.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Except these are very prone to false positives.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I find it very funny that people are so concerned about false positives. Models like these should really only be used as a screening tool to catch things and flag them for human review. In that context, false positives seem less bad than false negatives (although, people seem to demand zero error in either direction, and that's just silly).

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Wish I had more upvotes to give.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That stupid bit drilled less vs fewer into my head for the rest of my life.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago
load more comments
view more: next ›