this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
122 points (96.9% liked)

politics

19047 readers
3990 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Final (?) Debate thread before the election in 35 days.

Debate begins at 9 PM Eastern, 6 PM Pacific and runs 90 minutes.

Vice Presidential debates are always tricky since nobody has voted for Vice President in living memory.

Expect Vance to attack Walz on his military service.

Expect Walz to attack Vance on the whole "immigrants eating cats and dogs" thing.

Expect Vance to attack Walz on being an assistant coach, at best.

Expect Walz to roll out "Weird!" at least once.

CBS has announced the burden of fact checking will be on the candidates themselves.

https://apnews.com/article/cbs-debate-vice-president-fact-check-7a3b31c98ab092dd44915df57a359d10

How to watch here:

https://apnews.com/article/cbs-debate-vice-president-fact-check-7a3b31c98ab092dd44915df57a359d10

"How can you watch the VP debate on cable? 

CBS will air debate coverage starting at 8 p.m. ET on CBS broadcast stations and affiliates. Find your local station here.

How can you stream the VP debate without cable? 

The debate can be streamed on the free CBS News app on your connected TV or smartphone, on Paramount+, and all platforms where CBS News 24/7 is available, including CBSNews.com and YouTube. 

Debate coverage on CBS News 24/7 begins at 4 p.m. ET."

Edit Impressive how a debate can go when one participant doesn't have mental health issues! Thanks for coming everybody!

(page 8) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Walz answer was really good.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Walz has the receipts on improving the lives of the middle class.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Thank god, they actually muted!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, once Walz started talking after they let Vance say his whole point.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Too little too late lol

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Why always do this crap, where they act like they're not going to let just babble at their leisure and then they just do it anyway.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago

Mics got cut. Nice.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Ouch on the Haitian call.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago

LOL! "Thank you, senator, for describing the legal process."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, but then they cut their mics. Which was hilarious.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

They got it back. Mics got cut.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Vance talking over the moderators, now. That won't play well.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

I wish this was true....

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Vance is slick, but Walz is honest. I hope people can see the difference.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

Oh nice! Walz mentioned Wall Street speculators driving up housing prices. Then he literally quoted the Bible.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

Does Congress need to pass bills to help border patrol?

Vance: The president has to solve it by helping law enforcement.

JD, isn't that what the bill passing through Congress would do?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Springfield Ohio.

Please bring up cats and dogs. You know you want to. Fucking racist.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We're ~25 minutes in, and so far I would say this debate is close, but Walz is edging out Vance. He's not as polished, but he's coming across as more genuine, and he's directly answering.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

There's also the fact the JD is lying.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Funnily enough, I think Vance had a savvy answer on climate change and Walz has dominated on immigration

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

You mean like the fucking bill Trump killed!? Ok i am done. I’ve seen enough

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

walz is owning this one. he is doing great and vance goes between evading and just lying. Hes better and more consistent with his lies which makes this no where near as entertaining as the presidential debate.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

What the fuck does empowering the border agents mean? They are doing their jobs.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Walz just comes off as so goddamn nice. I wish I could meet him in person.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

Walz just dropped the pet eating bomb back on JDs head.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wtf is Vance talking about? So he’s going to continue separating families, got it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

He simply refused to answer.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Walz doing great going after Trump.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

exactly . Trump wants issues to run on, not solutions. We just saw this as he tried to manipulate the senate to not fix things so he’d have the problem to rail against and run on. This is anti-American.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

Walz nailed the immigration question. Vance is making up lies and using buzzwords.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

And Vance is simply refusing to answer the question about child separation. He simply won't.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

A winning comment by Walz here.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Walz directly quoting Trump's promises about the wall, including the "Mexico will pay for it."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

folks folks folks

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The borders aren’t open, you numpty twat. Just keep lying.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Do you live near the southern border? No one disagrees that there are serious difficulties with border enforcement and illegal immigration right now. They're debating what to do about it. I would honestly encourage you to follow more reporting on border issues. Like actual reportage, not commentary. It's rough.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I grew up in Phoenix, and we had a home in Puerto Penasco Mexico, so yeah. You don’t know me, so don’t assume I don’t know what I’m talking about. I don’t say things I can’t source, thanks.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You should look up what a question mark means. Relax.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

yeah the problem here is vance says things that could be decent. if they were actually true. walz is doing great but how do you debate just made up crap.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

vance is hilarious suggesting you get rid of the workers by deporting them. Obama showed you have to go after the employers which actually works.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

Vance: "Build the wall."

Yeah, no... I don't think you understand how big the southern border is or what terrain it's on, pal.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Trump got the house republicans to turn against their own bipartisan immigration bill so he can run on the issue. Hammer that hard.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Another non answer. No plan

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Good lord. Can he answer ONE FUCKING QUESTION? Just one.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Vance completely avoided that subject

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›