this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
418 points (98.8% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6764 readers
714 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I'm assuming that the Abrams tank makes sense to protect the people on deck from the blast of the guns on that turret.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

The armored triple turret on the carrier that is apparently being fired at the MiG did not meet the bar to be included in the description.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Also your F-117s are rocket powered or some shit because those flames are coming from the one place that isn’t exhaust

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I assume that that's just the tailgunner firing his flamethrower.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean, in fairness, at least the Mig-29 and F-117 are contemporaries, and deployed by enemies. I've seen playsets that include (iirc) an F-16 and a B-17 dogfighting against one another.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago

While the F-16 has the stronger letter, the B-17 takes the lead on the number. It's still anybody's game.

[–] [email protected] 86 points 2 months ago (9 children)

Ok, hear me out. The hull number is for the USS Enterprise (CVN-65), which was deactivated in 2012. After that, instead of decommissioning, Elon Musk decides he needs a private military and hires Erik Prince to set it up. He buys the still-intact Enterprise, gets it modified the way he wants it, and sends it to Brazil to force X/Twitter back into service there. Full of Blackwater/Xe mercenaries, meth and coke are distributed to all personnel as daily rations. Fueled by the success of their first mission (and lots of drugs and alcohol), the bastard craft took to the high seas. It resembled a mobile party now, but a heavily-armed party. They looted, they raided, they held whole cities to ransom for fresh supplies of cheese, crackers, guacamole, spare ribs and wine and spirits that now get piped aboard from floating tankers.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 months ago

I would like to participate in any rpg campaign you dm.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Entire front end is useless for takeoff and landing. Also, LOTS of heads gonna roll for an entire carrier group failing to protect the fucking carrier.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Well yeah its blocked off, thats where you park the tanks! Jeeze, it's like you've never heard of AFV flight deck deployments before.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

Sounds like a pretty normal day to me.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 months ago (1 children)

..... and someone has allowed a local news helicopter to fly over the ship to provide live video footage of an active war scene.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

This is gold, thank you.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I would like to start with the chain of command that insisted a battleship turret be installed on the flight deck.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago

Insert Bradley committee movie .mov

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›