this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
817 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

58885 readers
3675 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

But Moscow has ways of avoiding bans – as does Iran – and could have found a way to build Starlink-equipped kit that only becomes active once it crosses the border into Ukraine where SpaceX's service is allowed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 weeks ago (18 children)

As much as I hate Elon for all the shit he says and does, but it also shows the sanctioning for stuff like this is not waterproof. These units can be bought by company X in country X and sells it to company Y in country Y who is friendly with Russia. Also depending where they get launched from (for example from occupied Ukraine) it makes it also difficult to tell "friend" from "foe". Can that be prevented ? Probably, but it's not as straightforward as armchair generals may make it sound.

Now, could spaceX do something more about this ? Most likely. But that is resources you need to put on this, which is not profitable. So long story short. It's more than Elon bad here.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] [email protected] 84 points 3 weeks ago

Didnt we already know that elon opened starlink to the russians? I thought he announced after that call with putin?

[–] [email protected] 72 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Isn't that a massive security risk?

Like, what if the U.S was using Roscosmos satellite links in drones? I'd certainly be raising an eyebrow.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, but it's not a government satellite system, it's an independent Internet provider. It is always possible that the US government/military has access on the back end, but that's not guaranteed. And since Ukraine is using Starlink, they can't exactly just disable all access in the region.

Kind of makes sense for Russia to try and use Starlink at least a bit to test the waters and see what sort of Intel the US has access to directly through it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It is guaranteed, actually. US law imposes requirements on telecoms providers to support wire taps

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

A wiretap is different than having something like backdoor access at will for military use.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If the item is indeed Starlink hardware, it should be possible to prove its origins – perhaps even where it was bought, and by whom.

sheeeeeeeeeeeit. Starlink isn't going to say shit, maybe someone else controls the database of serial numbers?

Has Tesla even identified that TX CyberFuck that killed it's unidentified (?) driver in early August? I can't find any followup on that, except that the wreck was going to be auctioned at the end of August. It's the one truck that has gone dark in all of TX that month... easy to figure it out on Tesla's end.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Remember they fired their corporate communications and even municipalities mid-project can’t get anyone on the phone. It’s burning down.

That said, I would not be shocked at all to find Elmo with his fascist oligarch mitts on this. That fucker needs a serious regulatory beatdown. (Not an actual, like, punching him in the head beatdown.)

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago

(Not an actual, like, punching him in the head beatdown.)

Look, let's not be picky here

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 161 points 3 weeks ago

DOJ and Pentagon are you listening?

[–] [email protected] 351 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

It is almost like Elon is a really bad person.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

It's almost like the Oligarchs of the world are all on the same team.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 122 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

It's one thing to be a capitalistic shitbag, it's another to be a traitor. Governments like capitalistic shitbags

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

Seem like governments also love traitors, look at amount of deals and collaborations between starlink and the US government

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starlink#Military_applications

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

Corrupt governments like capitalistic shitbags.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Is it possible to be a traitor when you're a capitalist shitbag?

They only have loyalty to themselves and their bank account. Quite literally the world could burn (due to their business) for all they care.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

they could also have stolen it though. gotta wait what an investigation of the serial numbers finds

[–] [email protected] 51 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They are most likely stolen or imported through a third party.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Shouldn't they be capable of detecting where the connection is going and disconnect/block it for specific regions or something? I have no clue how any of that stuff works but this one thing feels like it should be the case.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The Starlink probably only works once the drone enters Ukraine. Disabling Starlink in that area would cut off the Ukrainian military too. The internet traffic could easily be routed through a VPN in another country, so blocking Russian IP addresses on Starlink wouldn't work either.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Whitelist/allowlist for this region comes to my mind. But probably some other specific problems would arise from this too. Hmm...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

If Starlink is the internet provider, aren't they providing the IP address? If they are how would a VPN trick Starlink since the equipment has to connect to Starlink first?

[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They do, but Ukraine uses Starlink, so they can't really disable usage entirely in the contested areas. They could disable the individual terminals, but that would require knowing which ones the Russians were using in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, given that they have access to Internet via starlink, all they would have to do is set up a website and list the IDs, then block everything that's not there.

They got me shipment? Add them to the list? No longer own the device? Remove it.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The problem is that not all of those terminals are being purchased by Ukraine, or supplied through official channels. There are tons of equipment being donated from third parties not directly affiliated, including Starlink terminals.

That's great if the Ukraine military were the only users in the region, but they aren't. Regular Starlink service is available in the country, outside military use. Even though the Ukraine military is using it, Starlink is not designed to be a military network. It is a civilian network that just happens to be available and extremely useful in this case, even with the Russian attempts to interfere with signals in the region.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›