this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
436 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19047 readers
3990 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 44 points 3 weeks ago (64 children)

Saw this just after reading the post about Russia knocking out Ukrainian citizens' ability to heat their homes this winter.

Any tankies wanna weigh in on why this is acceptable?

load more comments (64 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's making big sense lately why tankies LOVE trump so much.

He supports their favorite dictators very well.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

I hope all the tankies and "genociders" will vanish after november so we can have normal discussions.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Trump more and more desperate for those Russian funds. Probably gets $1 million for each Ukraine/Zelensky diss.

And he'll still get up in front of Americans and claim he's not taking the side of the most belligerent enemy of democracy on this planet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ukraine may be in rough shape, but no real fire fighter would stop trying to put out a fire at a burning house. There is always something to save.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Not that I disagree about Ukraine but a good firefighter would probably know if a house is a lost cause and that the best course of action is to prevent the fire from spreading to others.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago

Almost as if no analogy is 100% perfect

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

Its almost like thats exactly what has happened and is still happening. Russia would be on its knees if we actually stopped holding Ukraine back

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago

They would also yell at the people holding back the water.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

If Trump is elected, the USA would also be demolished, but you should not give up the entire country.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Don't worry though... If elected, he'll get Putin on the horn and the "special operation" will be over before the following sunrise.

[–] [email protected] 72 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I just refuse to listen to a chronically lying fat fuck who shits himself on the regular

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago

He's way too deep in bed with Russia, and has been since the 90s if not earlier, to ever be taken seriously. How the fuck he wasn't disqualified and charge over election interference and acting as a foreign agent in 2016 is beyond me.

[–] [email protected] 107 points 3 weeks ago

Concerning whatever this felon awaiting sentencing might say, recall that the opposite is true.

Slava Ukraini!

[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Trump laid blame for the conflict on President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, his Democratic rival in November. He said Biden “egged it all on” by pledging to help Ukraine defend itself rather than pushing it to cede territory to Russia.

“Biden and Kamala allowed this to happen by feeding Zelenskyy money and munitions like no country has ever seen before,” Trump said.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 weeks ago

It's great when his arguments only strengthen my resolve to stand with Democrats in supporting Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

feeding Zelenskyy money and munitions like no country has ever seen before

Except the Soviet Union during WW2. But we all know Trump is on the wrong side of that one too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Why didn't he resolve the conflict during his presidency?

Or we also believe him that it didn't exist when he was president? His first impeachment was for blocking already approved aid.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago

"they didn't extort ukraine for oppo research hard enough!"

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You know when you go to a movie and it looks amazing but turns out to be just the same fucking trope of a shitty guy with a sack of money belonging to an actual real bad guy and instead of just delivering it, the shitty guy blew it?

Now you gotta sit through two hours of him verbally fellating the guy then getting actually scared? That one?

Anyone else hate that trope?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Why do you hate No Country for Old Men?! (LOL, it's pretty close.)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 88 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

He'll say the same to Taiwan, too

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I mean, only if that's what Xi writes on the check's memo line.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›