this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Mycology

3020 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Since people can't seem to post non-paywalled things here: https://archive.ph/SxhOj

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Not technically a paywall FYI; just gated behind free registration. Still of course annoying.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

you pay in ways other than money…
i.e. forced registration is still paywalled… (and there’s usually an article limit or some such after that)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

This mental gymnastics definition of a paywall is not widely accepted. I was pointing out a small mistake. Is my website paywalled because you need to spend electricity to access it? A paywall is one where a monetary transaction is involved to view the content; that's just what the word means.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

wow, i didn’t know words became immutable as soon as they’re added to wikipedia….
or that monetary compensation is the only way to pay someone….

fantabulous

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Just because you dislike two things, you don't have to lump them under the same definition. Language could evolve to consider registration-required sites to have a paywall, but that would be stupid and counter to similar usages of "pay". People seem really eager to stretch negative definitions to include other things they dislike, but it's not the word that makes something bad, it's the thing itself. Two things can be different/distinct concepts and also be equally bad.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

just because you can’t understand things doesn’t mean you have to pretend i’m lumping things because i dislike them….

“pay” has NEVER been limited to currency… you’re just myopically capitalist….

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And you jump to ad hominem as soon as you're challenged. You should improve your conversation skills or you will flounder around and never correct inaccuracies in your beliefs. If you believe you do not have inaccuracies in your beliefs despite never changing them, you are wrong. Good luck.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

lol… no, you jumped to ad hominem… a word that you apparently don’t understand

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"No, you" is the best response you can come up with? Come on man.

This isn't worth my time. Blocked. I'll leave you with an acronym as a parting gift you'll find useful:

PW;DR - Paywall; Didn't Read

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

you’re an idiot and i’m not taking this “conversation” seriously….
and “no you” because you’re literally doing the thing you’re accusing me of, not because i’m rubber and you’re glue

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Oh, gee. We have to enter an email and give them data points. Cool.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

? I'm saying that's not what a paywall is by definition, not defending it as a practice. It's arguably even dumber since at least a paywall means you're directly financially supporting an outlet. This is just scuzzy for no real reason.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Don’t get in the middle of an angry mob and their target lest ye become their target, or something.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I had hoped Lemmy could avoid this effect. We seem to be a bit resistant but not immune unfortunately. That's probably the best I'm going to get though, so I can live with it lol