this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
526 points (98.9% liked)

Space

8644 readers
8 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

🔭 Science

🚀 Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Those clouds are doing a lot of talking in the picture on the right

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Idiots on Facebook are probably claiming that the image is fake, and using it as ‘proof’ that Mars doesn’t exist or something.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Mars hasn't this nice blue sky. Come on Cohaagen, give these people air... um... I mean an atmosphere.

[–] [email protected] 93 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Turns out rocks are rocks. (I'm a geologist I an I approve of this message)

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)


Interesting that Dean Norris was on Mars and has a special interest in ~~rocks~~ minerals.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (9 children)

i wonder if humanoid aliens would be a common thing throughout the universe

like a mass effect sorta thing

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Aren't the layers in the rock showing that water was definitely present on Mars, and that they're formed by sediment being deposited and forming into sedementary rock over time?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I’m not a geologist but I’ve read up on it a fair bit.

This Mars photo appears to be sandstone.

On earth sandstone is usually associated with ancient rivers, lake shores, and sea shores. But also sand dune fields.

The thing with sandstone though, is it’s not just sand. Rather, it’s sand plus time plus pressure plus cementation.

Now, the time part is obvious. What’s sandstone now was sand a long ass time ago (usually).

Pressure? That’s a little harder to understand for me here. Has mars ever had tectonic stuff going on to bury it (and hence have pressure applied), followed by erosion and uplift? Or am I incorrect and pressure is not a necessary condition? Maybe sandstone without pressure is a thing it’s just weaker and/or less dense? Maybe layers of volcanic basalt or something could have a similar effect? I don’t know and would love to have someone more knowledgeable fill this part out.

Cementation? This part, I’m nearly certain, REQUIRES water. On earth anyway, this happens when ground water absorbs chemicals from other rock/stuff (for example carbonates from sea shells, but there’s lots of other chemicals that can do this), then flows through the beds of buried sand, and some of those chemicals are deposited along with magical chemistry stuff happening, and your sand becomes sand stone.

So I don’t 100% know that the short answer to your question is “yes”, but I’m leaning towards a solid “yeah, probably, but I’m not a real geologist and Mars isn’t a real Earth so I dunno”.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

I could be wrong, but I don't think so in this case. Water would likely create more variation in banding where some groupings of layers is present and distinct. What I see in the differences at higher levels appears to be from exposure to wind and solar temperature fluctuations due to exposure. It looks too linear from top to bottom. With water I expect those more distinct sections of banding like you see on the Earth pic side. Maybe there was a lot more or less rain for a time due to a mountain range that came and went, or a local sea or large water basin. Those layers are deep time and more like the slow accumulation of an average dust before wind patterns shift significantly or some event shifts the composition like exposure of a different large rock unit to winds regionally. It is hard for humans to grasp deep time like this.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Think so. That's what I came here to ask

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I came to ask which picture is which then noticed the blue sky duh 😂

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

OMG I'm being leftright-shamed

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›