A tech news sub for communists
Currently using the "Zen Browser", which is another Firefox fork. Uses BetterFox for its default settings, and has decent privacy features built in... At least compared to default Firefox.
It has tabs in the sidebar instead of the top (vertical tabs?). At first I didn't like it, but now I don't think I could live without it :). Feels a lot less cluttered.
Looks interesting. Thanks.
The official ESR branch. This version gets frozen in time and they only do security updates for it. Doesn't update often and works great.
LibreWolf is good, just enable privacy.resistFingerprinting.letterboxing in about:config (they have binary repositories for Debian and some derivatives). There's also Arkenfox if you just want reasonable settings in Firefox
I saw arkenfox a while back but I found the instructions confusing (there is no one line install command in the readm).
You can just move the user.js in your firefox profile, and read the wiki for tweaks
Thanks
There's also GNU IceCat, which might be in your repo.
Good suggestion but it's not in the repos. I might just change distro and try something like NixOS. https://voidlinux.org/packages/?arch=x86_64&q=icecat
the enlightened repository maintainers don’t allow any Firefox/Chromium forks
I thought you were talking about Void when you said that. I use it too. Someone packaged librewolf for void and maintainsa repo, it works: https://github.com/index-0/librewolf-void
It's good that this exists for now but I feel projects like this are a bit ephemeral. Often when the maintainer stops getting utility from these they abandon it. I would have preferred if they had created a librewolf-bin package from the precompiled binaries since those are easier to maintain and can often be updated via scheduled github actions. This project is missing several releases between the 129 and 130 ones.
I'll try it though. Worst case I will have to switch back to mainline Firefox.
He did all the heavy lifting though, writing the template and all that. Updating the package in the future shouldn't require much more than updating the source destination in the template file when a new version comes out.
I guess you are right. The patches seem to not have needed any updates in a month.