Technology

966 readers

52 users here now

A tech news sub for communists

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Thoughts on Firefox forks? (lemmygrad.ml)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Yesterday I accidentally wiped my Firefox profile. Upon creating a new one I was hit with the realisation of just how many shit defaults Firefox has. This made me consider using a fork which un-enshittifies Firefox.

There is only one that I know of, LibreWolf. Thankfully it seems actively maintained. So on Windows I have started using that for now. On Linux I still use Firefox because the enlightened repository maintainers don't allow any Firefox/Chromium forks and I don't wanna use Flatpak or pacakge it myself.

Are there any other forks worth considering?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good suggestion but it's not in the repos. I might just change distro and try something like NixOS. https://voidlinux.org/packages/?arch=x86_64&q=icecat

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

the enlightened repository maintainers don’t allow any Firefox/Chromium forks

I thought you were talking about Void when you said that. I use it too. Someone packaged librewolf for void and maintainsa repo, it works: https://github.com/index-0/librewolf-void

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's good that this exists for now but I feel projects like this are a bit ephemeral. Often when the maintainer stops getting utility from these they abandon it. I would have preferred if they had created a librewolf-bin package from the precompiled binaries since those are easier to maintain and can often be updated via scheduled github actions. This project is missing several releases between the 129 and 130 ones.

I'll try it though. Worst case I will have to switch back to mainline Firefox.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He did all the heavy lifting though, writing the template and all that. Updating the package in the future shouldn't require much more than updating the source destination in the template file when a new version comes out.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I guess you are right. The patches seem to not have needed any updates in a month.