this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
356 points (96.1% liked)

politics

18894 readers
3168 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago

Is that ozempic hate monster being kissed by the old rapist that shits his pants and wasn't shot in the ear?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 hours ago

DoNT cAlL us DePloRAbles

Childless women are useless and people with degrees are worse people.

Lesson failed.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The US is a net exporter of oil, and has been one for the last several years.

https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/oil-and-petroleum-products/imports-and-exports.php

Why do you want to increase production if you're not going to export?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

What does this have to do with the article?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 17 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Who would have thought that being terrible people would be a bad strategy.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 hours ago

Well, it worked 2016 right?

[–] [email protected] 41 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Many are childless because they have been beholden to corporations and rich people far more than their parents were. They never had an opportunity to give their kids at least the life they had, so they opted not to have them. It's not that they didn't want them. They responded to the situation they were given.

I see these folks with generational wealth who have 16 children. It must be nice, but they're just another side of the same problem.

Chiding people for being childless is possibly the most tone-deaf take ever, and even more so from rich, corpo pawns.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 19 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 23 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

What do you expect from a political party that would rather sling poop than policy ideas (or concepts of ideas)?

[–] [email protected] 56 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I remember when I was a fundamentalist evangelical christian pro-life activist in my late preteens/early teens (picketing clinics was a favorite family activity), we used to have signs that said 'Adoption: the loving option'.

Turns out, maybe they don't care about adoption anymore. Just wombs.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 18 hours ago

A lot of these fucks like adoption, only because kids who've been bounced from foster to foster are way easier to indoctrinate into things. Just need to show them some attention.

load more comments
view more: next ›