this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
448 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3833 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

We have definitely been transported to an alternate universe

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Her voter base of Joe Rednecks don't have a passport, and stopped paying attention to the wherabouts of their birth certificate once it got them their first gun.

Voter suppression suddenly doesn't feel so good, when it puts your seat on the line...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

OK, I'm selling everything and moving to a cave in the mountains, because if MTG is going to act sane for 5 minutes in a row, then some serious shit is coming down

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Like a rat fleeing a sinking ship.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

This headline is easy to read wrong -- my brain grouped the subject of this headline the other way at first. I read, "Marjorie rages at (Mike and calls to fund government)" rather than "Marjorie (rages at Mike) and (calls to fund government)."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Selfish snake switches sides when her own side starts to lose pressure. Nothing strange here

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Seems like we've reached the point where most voters realize that virtually all government shutdowns have been the Republicans' fault.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago

It’s probably because preceding each shutdown they loudly proclaim that they will shut down the government and blame the dems… and then they do…

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Now is the time Dems must insist on border security bill and negating presidential immunity as a must for passing the budget

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I genuinely hope this is due to therapy and/or medication. I'm willing to wipe the slate for someone putting in real effort who just needs some sort.

But should she burn any fucking bridges after this...

[–] [email protected] 93 points 1 month ago (2 children)

MTG hasn't suddenly grown a ethocortical gland. She's getting polling numbers that scare her, and she wants to win reelection. Georgia is turning purple for a variety of reasons, and a government shut down would be bad for her campaign.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I haven't seen polling specifically for her district but, while Georgia is very purple (and has been since like 2014), her district is gerrymandered to hell and back to not be anything other than red. I think I saw that it's one of the deepest red districts in the country.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Deep red refers to voter registrations. It's generally a very good indicator which was they will go, but this election is anything but politics as usual.

I'm not privy to her internal polling, but I'll bet she saw numbers than people in her district are concerned about Trump, see a lack of leadership in the GOP, and are considering staying home rather than show up for her. Angry people show up to vote, and if enough people say they are going to vote Trump out, then she doesn't want to be on his boat when it happens.

Another possibility is that she's testing the waters for a Senate or Governor run in 2026. She doesn't need to move towards the center if she can bash people to her right. It makes her look reasonable and conciliatory without actually being either one.

Either way, she's not doing this because of principles. She's doing it for personal benefit, because she's a conservative.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Someone else in the thread posted this which nails it: https://lemmy.world/comment/12412369

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No, that part I get.

It's the worst person you know having a rational argument.

That's just throwing me, I just can't wrap my head around it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Uh has anyone done a brain slug check recently?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Sometimes when the slug wiggles a certain way it causes a normal thought to drip out.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Yeah, hers must have starved.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›