Asklemmy

Maybe a slight tangent, but it drives me insane when I see/hear people do the following in scripted or written content.

The normal, very casual sentence structure could be "Chocolate cake, which I am quite partial to..." but they will flip it around, which is usually fine, but they do it in a way that doesn't make sense with the words used. They'll do something like "Chocolate cake, of which I am quite partial to". (Where the correct rearrangement would be "to which I am quite partial")

I know its nitpicky because I can still perfectly understand their meaning, but it feels like people do it because they want to sound smarter. And that's fine! I just wish they'd go that tiny step further and learn how to properly use that method of sentence rearrangement! Drives me nuts.

That is all.

I think I disagree with a lot of the comments here. The "trying to sound smart" feeling only really occurs when there's a mismatch in decorum -- someone is trying to appear Higher and More Logical -- but that can happen with any word, especially adverbs.

Technically, your argument is fallacious.

"Technically" is a useless crutch word (techy!), and "fallacious" is hella overused outside of formal logic stuff, so here it's a mismatch in decorum. (What's the fallacy? Does the other just... disagree with you, or are you using a converse error like A implies B, therefore B implies A?)

Well, you don't always have to do that, per se, but you can irregardless.

A lot of crutch words are just innocent habits, too. [email protected] mentioned something like that... though there are always people who up their jargon levels for no reason other than To Be More L33t. ~and_screw_irregardless~

On the other hand, some words commented here are needed. For example, if a reviewer calls Grossman's The Magicians "erudite", it fits perfectly -- the book

Continuing on that feeling of summed-up-in-one-word-ness -- what alternatives do we really have for "whataboutism" or the "algorithm" or "milquetoast"? Those words hit hard, they sum things up.

The algorithm is an alt-right pipeline, of course he'll have that phase.

Great, another video on the most milquetoast youtuber drama I've ever heard.

Those words are concise, they roll off the tongue and evoke feeling! Don't shorten words just to sound more colloquial when you have a choice that really fits! And likewise, equally -- don't be grandiloquent just for the sake of it.

Or else you'll face floccinaucinihilipilification :3

“debunked”

"woke"

Perchance

Irregardless.. not a word.

bourgeoisie

Milquetoast, vice versa, vice-sa versa (sic), erudite, illucidate, confusing size for importance (saying big meeting instead of important meeting), commensurate, je no se qua, anything in Latin, anything in another language, latent space, probability space. We use lots of techniques to try to punch-up our perceived intelligence, neurotypical people do it sometimes because they have a tendancy to associate station in a hierarchy with "good traits" like intelligence and use these smart sounding words to try to project authority... ? Maybe? Sometimes I use smart sounding words to talk over/around people when I don't want to engage them for whatever reason. People after weird. I think it's easy to see when people are dumber than you, and much harder to see when people are smarter that you; especially the degree to which (to which, being another smart sounding word particle. Particle when used to ike this, another smartness showing phrase.) they are smarter than you. My rule of thumb is that if someone's dumb, that's easy for you to tell, but if you can't tell that they are blatantly dumb, they are likely to be at least close to you in intelligence. If they seem smart, they are likely smarter than your best case scenario guess (they are likely smarter than you think). Everything goes out the window when you start talking about people who learned English as not their first language. Also acronyms.

minutiae

milquetoast

Anodyne.

Digress/Digressed

A lot of examples people here are giving, are types of doublespeak: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qP07oyFTRXc

"Whataboutism" (a term for that already existed; it's called "getting called on your hypocritical bullshit"), "disinformation" (this term is literally just the BlueAnon answer to the MAGAt's "fake news"), jesus christ "fallacy" especially (Merely calling out a fallacy like you're an NFL ref at the Super Bowl is the same kind of sophistry as the fallacy you address if you're not gonna spend the time to dismantle it).

When people use industry specific jargon and acronyms with someone not in their industry.

It is a very simple rule of writing and communication. You never just use an acronym out of nowhere, you write it out in full the first time and explain the acronym, and then after that you can use it.

Artificial diamonds can be made with a High Temperature, High Pressure (HTHP) process, or a ...

Doctors, military folk, lawyers, and technical people of all variety are often awful at just throwing out an acronym or technical term that you literally have no way of knowing.

Usually though, I don't think it's a conscious effort to sound smart. Sometimes, it's just people who are used to talking only with their coworkers / inner circle and just aren't thinking about the fact that you don't have the same context, sometimes it's people who are feeling nervous / insecure and are subconsciously using fancy terms to sound like they fit in, and sometimes it's people using specific terminology to hide the fact that they don't actually understand the concepts well enough to break them down further.

Krusty: So he's proactive, huh?

Network Executive Lady: Oh, God, yes. We're talking about a totally outrageous paradigm.

Writer: Excuse me, but "proactive" and "paradigm"? Aren't these just buzzwords that dumb people use to sound important? Not that I'm accusing you of anything like that... [pause] ...I'm fired, aren't I?

Roger Meyers, Jr.: Oh, yes. [gets up to leave] The rest of you writers start thinking up a name for this funky dog - I don't know, something along the lines of, say, "Poochie", only more proactive!

Krusty: Yeah!

— The Simpsons S08E14 "The Itchy & Scratchy & Poochie Show"

Corporate-speak especially on linkedin from the types of users who use it as an influencer platform. “Synergy” for example.

Per se. Vis a vis. Erudite. Juxtaposition. Elucidate.

Right now, "demure".

My boss, specifically: "stonefruit".

I think the common goal is not to sound smart, but add variety and diversity to the language, so it doesn't sound so boring.

example https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken

This gets really boring and repetitive

Milieu

Pastiche

That's all I can remember now, I gotta ambulate my way over to the kitchen and make some coffee.