this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
243 points (96.6% liked)

World News

38979 readers
2748 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

I'm in the US so I've always needed a passport to watch porn (or anything else) in Britain.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 8 months ago

Oi yer got ye wankn loicense

[–] [email protected] 43 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

In case anybody needs a reminder, the UK Government's response to the Snowden Revelations that showed even more widespread surveillance of civil society in the UK than in the US was, unlike in the latter country, to pass laws that retroactivelly made the whole thing legal.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm an advocate of VPN but this is not the situation to recommend them but to chastise regulators and lawmakers for even allowing this. This is eroding our freedom of speech. I can see politicians expanding this and censoring terrorist speech and speech of certain political ideologies. It is the erosion our civil liberties we need to worry about.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I agree that it's a slippery slope, but what does this have to do with freedom of speech?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Smut is speech. Frankly, smut is the highest form of speech. You should not need to show your papers to speak or to listen

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So the latest the UK can call an election and get Labor in charge is January 2025, the same month this goes into effect. Wonder if they will rush a repeal or get blamed for it starting?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Easy. Everything bad that happens before January 2025 is Gordon Brown's fault, and everything after it's Kier Starmer's. You know it's true because it says so in the Daily Mail.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Whilst I appreciate the satire of the Tories' one and only politican strategy, as the Snowden Revelations showed back then, New Labour wasn't any better in their "keeping a watchful eye on the plebes" ways.

Looking down on the rest as riff-raff that needs to be kept in place is a feature of both Tories and New Labour.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The Snooper's Charter (which made all the things Snowden revealed actually legal) and the thing where it became illegal to film facesitting in the UK both happened under the Cameron administration after being pushed for when Theresa May was home secretary. New Labour didn't pass anything comparable.

It might well be the case that GCHQ started their mass surveillance of UK citizens under orders from Blair, but given that five independent inquiries have found that the security services lied to the cabinet about WMDs in Iraq, it's pretty plausible that they did it of their own volition despite it being illegal.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

I think the theory that New Labour knew perfectly well what was going on and are no different from the Tories in this makes a lot more sense, especially since the veritable explosion in the use of surveillance cameras dates back to their time as do cases of abusive police surveillance such as the Met infiltration of Ecologist groups (know because at least one of the women in one such group ended up pregnant from one such undercover cop).

Or are you saying that the New Labour leadership were such complete total incompetent numpties that they could not see any of this for their whole decade in power?!

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Discounting VPNs for a moment..

What if one person made an account with ID and then the entirety of the country just happened to know the login?

Usr: admin Pass: admin

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 81 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I mean, the government could tackle homelessness, or end child hunger, many appropriate subjects. But instead they want to regulate jerk-off material. Sad.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They are way more concerned with genitals than they should be.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Our genitals at that.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Pretty positive this is going to end up being a DNS level block that will be as simple as setting a dns server outside of the UK to bypass.

Because anything else would create an unbelievable amount of administrative overhead.

Also imagine the spike in identity theft this is going to cause.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago

China: “Hold my Tsing Tao

load more comments
view more: next ›