this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
19 points (85.2% liked)

politics

19138 readers
3318 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Harris said in her speech Wednesday she wants to increase the capital gains tax to 28 percent for those with $1 million or more in income, which is up from its current effective level of 23.6 percent but well shy of the 44.6 percent rate proposed in a budget update from the Biden administration in July.

So progress will slow down from Biden's glacial rate...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The much bigger question is whether Harris will succeed in taxing unrealized capital gains (as her campaign plans). Currently all the gains of the very rich are unrealised meaning they don’t pay any taxes. It doesn’t even matter if the rate is 22 percent or 40 percent. I actually really like Harris’ proposal of first fixing the system before hiking the rates

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The much bigger question is whether Harris will succeed in taxing unrealized capital gains

A cynical but likely take is it will go about as well as when Biden made campaign promises dependent on congressional votes...

Even if we have majorities, we'll be told we don't have the numbers to pass a vote so no vote will be held

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Oh I mean, I am cynical as well. First about whether she’ll push through. Second, about congress agreeing. Just pointing out that the discussion on the rate is not so important.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

Biden was never going to pass a capital gains tax increase before the election. Dems want to campaign on the issue, and Biden retiring means he can propose all sorts of shit that will make Harris seem reasonable.

28% is still way too low, but if they can tax unrealized gains used as collateral, that would close a massive loophole and bring in far more revenue than a few percentage points on realized gains.

But yes, Harris has indicated that she's a centrist, and there aren't enough progressives in Congress to move the ball forward. Putting Trump behind bars would be enough for me, though.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago

The Hill - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Hill:

MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://thehill.com/business/4863337-mark-cuban-harris-tax-policy-capital-gains/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support