this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
138 points (84.2% liked)

Fediverse

28924 readers
1380 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is a follow-up from my previous thread.

The thread discussed the question of why people tend to choose proprietary microblogging platfroms (i.e. Bluesky or Threads) over the free and open source microblogging platform, Mastodon.

The reasons, summarised by @[email protected] are:

  1. marketing
  2. not having to pick the instance when registering
  3. people who have experienced Mastodon's hermetic culture discouraging others from joining
  4. algorithms helping discover people and content to follow
  5. marketing

and I'm saying that as a firm Mastodon user and believer.

Now that we know why people move to proprietary microblogging platforms, we can also produce methods to counter this.

How do we get "normies" to adopt the Fediverse?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What made reddit so popular in my opinion was that every sub wasn't filled with agenda driven narratives you could find interests or memes random people with deep insights to whatever the topic was.

In Lemmy it seems every sub is skewed with left wing or DTS filled insane ppl and to find just normal shit is the rarity

Much like when there is an exodus on other platforms to host only right leaning viewpoints a "normal" person viewing it will see the same thing Lemmy has become and just go back to what they were using before

The problem is not the platform its the people. Chill tf out with all that propaganda horseshit and u might get regular ppl to use your product.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Maybe the "age of the free internet" has passed and people just expect bad faith and react completely radicalized today.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Why do we want to? They'll just lower the overall quality and bring on the enshitification.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The reason I personally don't recommend or hardly even mention Lemmy to anyone else is because here's hardly any content they'd be interested in. The vast majority of posts are quite esoteric and directed at the kind of people who already are here.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

Did you have a look at [email protected] ? There are threads with different topics with active communities.

Discoverability of smaller communities is definitely an issue we are trying to solve with this.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

We don't. Normies made Reddit suck and they'll make Lemmy suck too. Always have at least a small barrier to tech entry. When anyone can use it then everyone will use it. So do you want Facebook? Because that's how you end up with fucking Facebook.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

It’s way harder to find posts on mastodon compared to bluesky as you have to follow people to start getting a feed, whilst in bluesky they have a discovery feed. This makes it a way more streamlined experience for users, making bluesky and threads far more attractive to users than mastodon

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

People have suggested making a portal/quiz for instance signups, but that adds to the barrier. There are also problems like how in-depth and inclusive it should be. It reminds me of Linux distro pickers that often suggest weird niche distros.

There are already big/default instances in the Fediverse though but there are people who actively discourage this. Maybe Mastodon just had a bad start and Bluesky learned from that. I wonder if Bluesky's PDS will be like Fediverse instances though. Many Fediverse instances are built around shared interests but the PDS just looks like a glorified handle.

Personally, I think the Fediverse discourse should shift to designing social media with decentralization in mind rather than mimicking mainstream social media with a "decentralized twist". I don't think the Fediverse will ever be as big as Twitter, but it doesn't have to be. It just needs to be sustainable enough to keep new conversations going.

Doesn't answer the question but maybe it's worth sharing anyway.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (4 children)

PDS just looks like a glorified handle.

They look the same to me. I had a look at Bluesky yesterday, every PDS I could find was just using their domain as username, I could never find a [email protected]

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I'm surprised nobody has mentioned porn yet. Like it or not, it does drive growth.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Yeah, porn is the only reason I still visit Reddit from time to every day.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Yeah! I think that's going to sway in this place's favor very soon.

I predict a glorious age of the very best curated pornography being here.

As other preferred platforms enshitify, I expect a lot of innovate erotic sensual and/or dirty artists (new and established) to have a dynamic, accessible, profitable experience here.

It's probably going to be very horny, but also really beautiful in a lot of pro-social ways.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

At the moment federation between platforms is not useful. The only advantage is federation between Instances. I've used my sister at a test for what the average woman would think about it.

Aspects she thinks is cool are that it's owned by people and designed for people, that its left leaning and inclusive.

Aspects she doesn't care about are privacy, lack of ads, federation between instances, federation between platforms.

Aspects she doesn't like are her friends aren't there, none of the accounts she like are there, no recommendation algorithm. She also hates the name fediverse.

I think that we need to stop being boomers clutching our chronological feed and word of mouth discovery and embrace algorithms. That's not to say we can have chronological feeds it's just that we should include and option and serve some form of content recommendations.

I also think threads will be a major player in drawing people in. Its easier to convince people who use Instagram to switch from Twitter to threads than Twitter to Mastodon. Once they're on threads they can start being a part of the fediverse and then eventually they might decide to try out one of the instances.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

With better design and better branding. These poorly illustrated mouse lookin icons are not helping us in any way.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

There are some loud voices in the fediverse who don't want it to be very welcoming. Here are a couple examples:

Threads defederation - what could onboard people to the fediverse faster than a giant platform run by Facebook joining? Yes, I hate Facebook as much as everyone else here, but they're making an offramp for their users and half the fediverse wants to close that off?

Overbearing enforcement of norms - yes, it's good if people put alt text on their images and content warnings on stuff lots of people find upsetting. It's harmful to hassle people about it until they leave.

I think people who a small network with strong social norms are better off on servers that are selective about what they federate with to ensure stricter adherence to the preferences of their users. One of the great things about federated systems is that users can pick a place that's run in a way that works for them.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If threads is incorporated into the larger fediverse, sure you'll get a bump in dau, but threads will eventually dominate the user base. Then if they devide to cut ties with Lemmy sites, the fediverse basically loses 90% of engagement overnight.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Threads users are much more likely to interact with other microblog software like Mastodon than with Lemmy. It might be possible to post from Threads to Lemmy now by tagging a community much like Mastodon, but I have never seen it done. Lemmy.world does not block threads.net.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Sure. Substitute "Lemmy" for whatever fediverse service it is mingling with.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You make good points, but I still think nothing good can come of playing ball with Facebook. I dont trust them

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

You should not trust them.

I don't think a Mastodon server attempting to attract a mainstream audience should block them though, at least not at this point. We have a chance to welcome millions of people who wouldn't have even heard of the fediverse otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

Make it look like a centralised system initially. Provide a portal to a pre vetted/chosen instance that is accepting new members in their locale/country, that is the same for everyone.

Update: This (above) is badly written. I'm trying to say every potential new member gets presented with the same (pretend centralised) portal that is in fact an (valid long-lived) instance local to the individual potential for them to sign up with. So two local users in Oz get given a proxy to the instance local to them, and a user in Blighty an instance local to that person. The decentralised Lemmy looks centralised, but isn't. The proxy front end should explain that they're joining their local instance and it's like a network of little affiliated clubs that can see each others posts globally. they log in for the first time it will become clear.

It's late, I'm tired, sorry everyone. Is that any better?

I think it's confusing (the reverse of what they're used to) for a newbie who have been bought up in a centralised internet with single front ends of all the big players to be presented with little instances to join to access the whole.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

How hard would it be to create a little quiz that directs or chooses an instance based on your interests?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think the hard part would be keeping it up to date as instances change

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

True. I forgot how easily an instance could disappear overnight. Happened to me in another instance

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I send people links to posts on Lemmy, and tell people I can't see Instagram/Twitter/etc.

Is it working? No, not really, but it feels like it should.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

You're doing better than I am. I just bullshit them and say I'll "probably check it out later." By which I really mean whenever it gets reposted on a less shitty technology platform, in a few decades. But I don't say that part.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

Thank you for trying

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Lemmy (or at least lemmy.world) was bonkers levels of buggy last summer during the reddit blackout. Like, literally unusable levels of buggy. Getting the word out that it's (mostly) bug-free now would probably be good, because I'm sure there were many redditors who tried it and quickly swore it off as a pile of shit.

Otherwise I'm in agreement that the instance-selection part of sign-up is a huge barrier, because what instance you choose is actually really important but it's overwhelming when you're just getting started. Plus not being able to migrate your account/communities/posts to another instance if yours goes to shit/shuts down/turns out to not fit your needs makes the fediverse feel really unstable.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Otherwise I’m in agreement that the instance-selection part of sign-up is a huge barrier, because what instance you choose is actually really important but it’s overwhelming when you’re just getting started.

Point them to lemm.ee, they can move later if they want. The name is neutral and it's the second biggest

Plus not being able to migrate your account/communities/posts to another instance if yours goes to shit/shuts down/turns out to not fit your needs makes the fediverse feel really unstable.

Can people move their posts from Twitter/Reddit now that they are enshitiffied? This requirement isn't usually expected from centralized systems, so this should be the same here

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The difference is if the primary (sometimes only) admin of your instance loses interest, goes to jail, or gets hit by a truck, your entire instance could be dead in the water, whereas there are way more safeguards to "established" social media like Reddit and Twitter. Plus the issue of "well shit my instance got defederated from most of the fediverse because it turns out the admin is an asshat" is completely nonsensical on platforms without instances. Example: before I knew that Lemmy had a tankie problem, I almost signed up on lemmygrad because I thought it was just a witty pun...

Plus when you say "point them to lem.ee" what scenario are you imagining? Because "you should join reddit" or "our business is on Facebook" or "Twitter is a great resource for artists" are all straightforward and easy pieces of information to convey and pick up. "Join Lemmy, a subset of the fediverse, I signed up via lemmy.world although I hear lem.ee is also good, but don't let that stop you from picking another instance" is like... Dude, people just want to go to [site].com, click on "sign up", enter a username and password (and maybe email) and that's it. Just having to explain to people that "lemmy.com" isn't a thing is already too complicated for most folks.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

The difference is if the primary (sometimes only) admin of your instance loses interest, goes to jail, or gets hit by a truck, your entire instance could be dead in the water

That's why you should use an instance with at least two admins who communicate regularly on how they are doing

“established” social media like Reddit and Twitter.

Twitter has been purchased by Musk who is pushing misinformation over the whole platform. Being an established social media does not offer any guarantee.

what scenario are you imagining?

Literally that "looking for a Reddit alternative with better clients, no ads, no bots? Have a look at Lemm.ee "

Agreed on you with skipping the whole federation explanation, it's unnecessary and complicated

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

It was hit with a DDOS for an extended period of time. I suspect the attackers were successful in substantially hampering adoption of Lemmy as a whole.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›