this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

FediLore + Fedidrama

2262 readers
2 users here now

Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)

Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.

Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc

(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama

Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse

Partners:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This was originally written as a reply for this thread: https://lemmy.world/post/19238577

I'm copying it here because I don't trust a LW admin to just not delete it right away since that seems to be something they love doing.

tl;dr - a user calls out the LW mods for rapid fire banning a bunch of users today, I investigate

=====

Let's review some of these bans, as called out by [email protected]:

https://lemm.ee/post/40926293/14446156

https://imgur.com/YSoJbgs

From the top:

=====

[email protected] https://imgur.com/4XsXuOC

Quote: "LW admin/mod team seem to have this overbearing and weird belief that they need to tell everyone else what to think and how to think it. How about... you all just fuck off and don't?

Result: Permaban

=====

[email protected] https://imgur.com/LIye27F

Quote: "All rights are won through violence, child. Bans on here means less than the nothing platitudes you utter"

Result: 15 day ban

=====

[email protected] https://imgur.com/ONGdgNo

Quote: [the quote is really long, pls dont make me type it and just look at the link lol]

Result: 15 day ban

Note: the comment precedes the ban by 26 days, but catloaf's recent comment history contains opinions critical of the LW News mod team

=====

[email protected] https://imgur.com/q2kktNQ

Quote: "Damn what a shame, guy almost stopped being a moderator on an internet forum, would have been a grave tragedy"

Result: Permaban

=====

[email protected] https://imgur.com/ZCRtuJe

Stormesp's profile at lemm.ee: https://lemm.ee/u/stormesp

Quote: [there were no comments removed in the modlog, but stormesp's recent comment history contains opinions critical of the LW News mod team, read them yourself]

Result: 15 day ban

=====

[email protected] https://imgur.com/YwIMSOq

Quotes: [multiple quotes, there are a lot, check out the link]

Result: 15 day ban

=====

Summary

Most interestingly here is that the two users who got permabanned didn't use slurs and didn't call for violence, they merely insulted the moderator team. I guess in the LW News mod team's eyes, that's a horrible, terrible, awful, unforgivable offense, so.......... PERMABAN.

Aniki literally is saying "words are useless, let's resort to violence" but that's a 15 day ban only, OK, makes sense, right????????

Catloaf and Stormesp were actively leaving comments sparring with the moderator team in that thread. To be honest, none of what I'm seeing in these comment seems worthy of a ban. Unless of course, you're a LW mod and you go "this guy is disagreeing with me, therefore they deserve a ban."

Edit: I forgot to write about MindTraveller since that ~~guy~~ douchecanoe was a last minute addition. But look at those aggressive comments, ~~guy~~ douchecanoe deserves a ban for sure.

Edit 2: fixed pronouns for MindTraveller

=====

Conclusion

Not a good look. Does LW want to grow into a good Reddit alternative or do they just want to turn it into Reddit for themselves only?

LW can at least come clean about this and say "yes, the rest of you can get fucked" or maybe they will have a moment of realization at some point "oh my god, are we the baddies?"

top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's why I'm a proponent of a a truly federated system where for any community you would be able to choose which are the people in charge of moderating/curating your feed.

You need to be able to criticize moderators, and moderators need to be able to accept criticism, both good and bad. Some of those bans really speak towards really insecure moderation. I'm also not a fan of them being able to get complete anonymity while doing so. What usually happens is the problems is a bad apple within the mod team but the rest will still get defensive regardless when the only one you can blame is the entire group, it's group psychology 101.

Even "ACAB" cops all have an ID number that can identify them, and on lemmy it's even easier to create an alt. Heck, if you go over to their Matrix chat and talk to lemmy heads, they don't consider unfair abusive lemmy bans a big deal because "its ok if people are forced to create a new alt, if they aren't culpable they won't get banned again". Literally fucking shit logic, specially considering if a ban was actually justified you would not want to lose track of who that person is masquerading as.

The same reddit double standard is here, and I see that the modlog doesn't even seem to be displaying who the particular admin or mod who performed the action was anymore while still providing only the most minimal explanation with no chance for individual users to contest it. Seriously, all it took was for mods to create a mod alias, but even that was too much?

People left Reddit because of the API problem, but the problem was there long before. Subreddits like modsbeingdicks and others got banned even though their moderation did a top notch job at making sure personally identifiable information was removed from posts and comments in comparison to other subreddits that still remain. The future of Lemmy may very well be limited to becoming a poor man's Reddit. The Stanford prison experiment, read up on it, and if you find it too uncomfortable, jump on the bandwagon of trying to find something to nitpick about the study as it has become customary to do so, doesn't change how relatable it is.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

I don't identify as a guy, I'm nonbinary. Please edit your insults to respect my gender identity.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

LW is partially moderated by people that can't take any criticism and that shows in their rules, sign-up process and admin behavior, not all their admins/mods seem to be like that, but those that are are so very very much. This behavior reminds me of awkwardturtle and i wouldn't be surprised if it is him under another name.

Such behavior can also be seen by another "general purpose instance" (.ml) and slrpnk does not seem to be much different.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

slrpnk does not seem to be much different.

Is it? I never interacted with those communities a lot

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lets say they deploy the same tactics as lemmy.ml and their admins moderate according to their opinions not facts.

On the same note lemmy.zip seems to have similar issues.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Any example for lemmy.zip? They seemed quite reasonable in their moderation last time I checked

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lets just say they ban people for hate where there is no hate. (unless hate means not believing in a made up genocide and calling out fake news/fake accusations that clearly have a antisemitic goal) but they seem to be relatively reasonable regarding most other things, they still deploy the super bans like .ml does however.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

not believing in a made up genocide and calling out fake news/fake accusations that clearly have a antisemitic goal

Hm, if that's your stance, I can see why you get banned on slrpnk and lemmy.zip, which are not exactly known for very aggressive moderation

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah that was and is my stance. And its just the truth.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do you have any sources to support it?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Is it up to the claiming party to provide sufficient evidence or is it up to the person saying there isn't sufficient evidence to proof something. I have yet to encounter any actual genocidal activity, yes Israel did wrongs in gaza but callin that a genocide is just not true, even according to ICJ there is no genocide.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/key-takeaways-world-court-decision-israei-genocide-case-2024-01-26/

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Another perspective "Rights expert finds ‘reasonable grounds’ genocide is being committed in Gaza "

https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/03/1147976

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

UN itself is not a credible source on any Israel related matter and the court decision as shortened by Reuters is what is consens in the legal communitys interpretation. UN has proven times and times again that they are not neutral regarding Israel. That is including but not limited to saying the Gaza ministry of health, wich is a hamas run institution is a credible source for casualty numbers, despite numerous clear and heavy false data fabrications such as the "800 deaths in the hospital "struck by Israel"" wich was a defective rocket of hamas that struck a parking lot near the hospital.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The Gaza Ministry of Health thing rings a bell.

No time to investigate this further now, but if someone can jump in to bring sources on the matter (whatever side), that would be nice.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Interesting, thanks. I haven't followed the international court decisions since a while, guess I need a refresher.

An article I just found on the matter: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx88l499vero

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

There was a arrested warrant issued, i do support the decision by icj, however that is not proof that anyone is guilty, a arrest warrant is there to trial someone accused of crimes. Btw the hamas guy was trialed by fire from what i know. And knowing Israels issues with UN they won't send their president or ex president to a UN court, just like us as wouldn't, or actually nobody really would.

Again, war crimes doesn't equate to genocide, and accusations of war crimes especially not.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Small clarification, @MindTraveller participated in that thread, but was banned while a comment of theirs was removed in a separate post. That's why they're not included in the list.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Thank you for using my preferred pronouns and not calling me a "guy"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

From the outside looking in… Stop posting on Lemmy.World communities then. I'm not sure why that's such a difficult concept for some people.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I’m not sure why that’s such a difficult concept for some people.

Point taken, but come on, you should know why it is difficult.

This is a pie chart of the community distribution:

https://lemmy.ca/post/26878531

Notice which ones have the biggest shares? World, .ml, and Hexbear - three of possibly the shittest instances on Fedi at the moment.

Unfortunately until communities outside of LW become more lively, if most people are looking for drive-by discussion, they will find it at LW. For now.

In order to change that, we can all chip in to start livening up communities outside LW, like Blaze seems to be doing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately until communities outside of LW become more lively, if most people are looking for drive-by discussion, they will find it at LW. For now.

Be the change you want to be. Building communities is hard work!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Building communities is hard work!

Tell me about it.

Also, as you are on Beehaw, do you think there is any chance that you guys would refederate with LW and SJW?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

🤷 Word is we’re eventually moving to Sublinks, not sure if that’ll change anything

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not sure either, Beehaw could move to Mbin tomorrow, the point would still stand: do you consider refederating 😄

At the moment it's a bit frustrating because while Beehaw communities are nice (hu hu), knowing that posting there will prevent LW and SJW people from seeing your post can demotivate potential posters.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

I agree! I have a guest account for lw in Voyager, but I still mostly browse here.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

World, .ml, and Hexbear

I would focus more on the second listing which has 57 for LW, 10 for lemmy.ml and 5 for SJW

Hexbear only has 1

I'm kind of impressed lemm.ee has even 3 top 100 communities due to the predominance of LW.

Also, I just had a look again. The 100th monthly community is starwars memes, and I count at least 2 sopuli communities above, [email protected] and [email protected]

we can all chip in to start livening up communities outside LW

Indeed, as always, feel free to join us on [email protected]

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Seconded.

There is [email protected] , it's quite active and the instance is well managed

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It does seem heavy handed, but given how incredibly insufferable and annoying vegans on Lemmy have been recently, I can't say I blame the admins for deciding they've had enough.

Lemmy.world admins made it very clear they considered the statements being made as animal abuse, and that it wasn't welcome on their platform, and the community mods actually banned an admin in response, and reinstated a bunch of deleted comments.

I think the vegans will probably move communities, and it's probably the best option at this point.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If the LW admins feel justified in permabanning people for what they perceive as animal abuse, then surely the vegans are equally justified in being mean to people for what they also perceive as animal abuse. Your comment seems to indicate a double standard.

Also the LW admins decided to reinstate the c/vegan mods because they correctly identified that the admin who went rogue was overstepping.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

LW is where so many ex-Redditors start off so there's bound to be users among them who were/wanted to be mods and just aren't good at it.

I blocked one of that communitys mods off my feed because they made it obvious that they think being a mod makes them special.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Something I learned the very hard way, against my will, is when you have a user who is seriously against the mods, and doesn't really care about the sub, it's often best to just ban them.

Normally, the max I give is a week or two, long enough for most to move on, but some people just get obsessed. Others will literally ask to be banned. Those catch a perma.

Not saying the LW admins are right, but moderation is harder than it looks on the outside. Also ban evasion is basically a feature of Lemmy, it's so easy, and a lot do it.

It sucks, mods suck, being a mod sucks, everything sucks.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

In my opinion it was a mistake for Lemmy to copy the same failed moderation model as Reddit.

In offline politics, we’ve learned from history that non-democratic governance always leads to the abuse of power. But somehow we imagined that in the online world this same dynamic would not play out. However, I don’t have a fully formed alternative in mind right now. It’s a thorny issue.

And I’m not trying to shit on LW admins here. I generally think they’re doing their best. But they’re only human, and it’s hard not to respond to people being shitty to you without being shitty to them. If you have an issue with what they’re doing, I would highly recommend you approach it in a polite way. Not just because it’s likely to have a better outcome. It’s also just the right thing to do.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

However, I don’t have a fully formed alternative in mind right now.

The fediverse is already the alternative. The fediverse is democratic, you're just not thinking about it that way.

It's not democratic in the sense that you vote for your instance's admins and your communities' mods (though that is an option too). It is democratic in the sense that any user chooses their own instance and communities. So if you don't like your current instance, go to a different one. You vote by choosing your instance and your communities.

Of course if you would like an instance that democratically elects their admins and mods, you are free to go to such an instance (or start your own). But anyone who "loses" the election are also free to simply start their own instance and be an admin anyway, even though they lost. The users who voted for the losing candidate could then just go to that instance. And then we're kinda back to the same situation: you vote by choosing an instance and that's a good thing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I've seen one instance elect their admins with a vote. Seems like a small improvement on that regard

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I personally don't think that's the right mindset of how you "vote" on the fediverse, see my comment here: https://feddit.dk/comment/10129007

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

The potential new admins wanted it to have trust from the users. I can understand.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Jlai.lu. It's in french, the vote was on [email protected]

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It means nothing, because these folks have complete control, but it fundamentally shouldn't be a ban for arguing with a mod or general shit talking. They've used the civility rules to essentially put moving target on what "disagreement" and "ban" looks like.

Telling a mod to fuck off should, at most, result in a deletion.

Lemmy mods jump to scorched earth

Edit tldr many more deletes, far less bans

Edit edit I'm not saying it's cool to just like, be a complete asshole, blow up a community, chase a mod around yelling garbage.

But it seems like mods here are far more trigger happy and "you don't see the world like I do, so banned" than any chat forum I've seen in the past.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

here

Depends on the community, not sure if you meant "here" as [email protected] or Lemmy as a whole