The pessimist in me worries it will break in a storm then get paraded around as an example of why wind can't replace fossil fuels...
this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
72 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
59378 readers
3611 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
It might but wind based energy production won't go away. It has already proven its place in energy production. While there's a lot of people that had invested in fossil and nuclear, there's a lot of investors in wind energy too.
Wind energy production will just get more efficient and getting closer to being CO2 neutral in the future.
This is an enormous engineering achievement, they already make 16 MW offshore turbines:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_L6Yz3t9e8
Wow, what's the size limit going to actually be? 20MW is phenomenal from a single turbine, but what could we hit?
It's an interesting question actually, there would be a material limit to how long components like the blades can be.
It's also possible they're just not cost effective above a certain size, too.