this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
73 points (100.0% liked)

unions

1283 readers
30 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

'You're not allowed to not come to work' is slavery.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Has anyone burned some sage around the PM to drive away Thatchers and Reagans ghosts?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Unfortunately the Australian government is busting the CFMEU.

They're trying to set a very dangerous precedent

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The government probably wouldn't have if both rail lines weren't shut down simultaneously.

The Teamsters should take a page from the way the UAW/CAW handles the Big Three; focus negotiations on one, then tell the other "here's the template".

Keeping the rail lines running is too critical for the government to allow a protracted lockout/strike, but a (non-conservative) government would likely allow far more leeway if only one of the railways are shut at one time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Oh it's sooo critical, but not enough for the state to slap capital instead of labor. God forbid the government pressure the fuckers with all of the money. No - surely the answer is always always always to lean on the people doing the actual work.