this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
592 points (98.2% liked)

News

22852 readers
3464 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Conservatives are gullible as fuuuuck, no matter their skin color.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

What did you expect Uncle Tom? Are you really shocked the face eating leopard party had leopards that ate your face?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago

Who would have thought the leopards would eat MY face!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I’m sure they followed with, “But you’re one of the good ones…”

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

It's funny, I almost made a similar comment but decided not to because I was worried it sounded too racist. Had typed out and discarded

"They usually tell me real nice things like "I'm one of the good ones "

-that guy probably

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

leopards & whatever.

faces or something

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He never thought the leopards would eat his face!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

That’s what I was thinking. Such a handsome guy, surely not THAT face!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

Who could've predicted that fascists would act like such Nazis?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago

HE can't BELIEVE leopards ate HIS face!

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And now he is suing for discrimination, probably taking advantage of legislation passed by democrats

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, "racial discrimination lawsuit" sounds like a bunch of woke Democrat talk to me.

Seriously, I do hope he wins some money off of those assholes, but I hope even more that this was a wakeup call for him about the sort of people he was affiliating with, and the sort of views he has been supporting.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He just has a bad case of revitiligo it's not his fault

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Iss tha' opposite o' what Michael Jackson got!

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 weeks ago

Seeing someone that dark in a maga hat almost looks like blackface

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 61 points 2 weeks ago

I have as much sympathy with black trumpers as I do for the jews for hitler people.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

What did he expect?

[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Yes that’s unsurprising and yes he’s probably a bad person, but also I feel the need to say that’s a really shitty thing to do to him. Even shitty people deserve to not be targeted by racist remarks.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

no, they do.

They are enabling the racists to be further empowered to take further racist actions that effect other people. They deserve the same racism they're enabling to happen to them.

The guy's an uncle tom. if you think that's a shitty, racist thing to say

  1. He deserves it

  2. Maybe I should call him an uncle ruckus instead.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

I think there’s a worthwhile distinction between somebody “deserving” a consequence, versus having it coming because they (wholly or partially) brought it upon themselves.

The classic example is drunk driving. We don’t execute people for it, nor should we. But when somebody is hammered and runs into a tree at 2x the speed limit, they kind of had that coming even though it IS still a tragedy. We look at the silver lining that at least they didn’t take any innocents with them.

In this case, of course the racism is bad and shameful, and it’s the same assholes doing it. It should not be happening. But when the already-existing racists get help from one of the very people they’re trying to marginalize… I mean this is exactly the kind of crap the leopards eating faces meme was created for. I shouldn’t need to explain the absurdity, lol.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Kind of but let’s say:

Someone offered you to fight a bear for $5k.

He assures you the bear is safe.

People around you tell you it’s not, and don’t be an idiot.

Is it your fault if you chose to take the con man’s offer and fight the bear or the con man’s fault?

I started thinking about this after the titanic submarine disaster. Like, how is that not like a Darwin Award?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The difference is that racists are not bears. They’re people behaving poorly. I think this is better compared to a thief getting robbed by his partner in crime. Is he a fool? Yes. Is he a bad person? Yes. Can I blame his partner in crime for this? Also yes. In both cases it’s an idiot and a bad person walking into a position that another person behaved poorly towards them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

So what it comes down to is:

Are bigots and racists more like a bear that is obviously hazardous, or are they like your friend that betrays you.

I truly believe they are more like the first one if you just listen and think about the things they constantly say. But maybe that takes more critical thinking than I should expect from the average person.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Don’t think friend that betrays you, think criminal who you may feel you can work alongside, but demonstrates no loyalty to you beyond direct gains.

If we treat them as bears we ignore the capacity to change that is the very thing that damns them. You, me; and everyone here knows damn well that very few bigots change. And I’ve more than heard enough from bigots to know how monstrous some of them are. My existence happens to be political at the moment.

When a person decides to pick a fight with a particularly large and territorial member of the order Carnivora I place sole blame on the person and not the ursine participant because the person is a person and the bear is a bear. When a person decides to interact with a bigot of their own free will I have no sympathy for them and still blame the bigot because the bigot had the choice to change and I’m not going to let bigots off the hook for being a bigot. So really, it’s that either party could’ve averted this situation rather than just the one, and both should’ve.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

You, me; and everyone here knows damn well that very few bigots change

because the bigot had the choice to change

So I like how you’re giving them agency and saying it’s on them to change. So my perspective is an extension of that. They are adults, I expect them to behave like one and/or be ready for the consequences.

So if someone knowingly acts as hostile as a bear, imo you should treat them like a bear to further discourage said behaviour. Imo its the biggest issue today, especially in politics (Harris’ campaign is turning it around it seems).

When someone acts horribly and in bad faith, you can’t act back in good faith and give them the benefit of the doubt or “realize their capacity to change”. You call them weird, you treat them like a bear.

When they go low, they got a knee to the face.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I think the difference is in how you and I treat bears lol. I treat bears as valuable members of an ecosystem that’re best kept in the wild, though can be glorious to view from a distance. I treat bigots like losers who need to be stopped because they’re going to hurt someone. We mock them, we keep their victims safe, and most importantly we make sure that they don’t get their way. Please don’t treat your local wildlife like that.

I recognize their capacity to change in that by applying sufficient pressure I can make them quit being so on this weirdo bullshit. They may stay a bigot but by the gods we can shut them the fuck up.

And I guess really the crux of my original stance is that if anyone deserves racism it’s a bigot, they’re experiencing hate like they express, but I don’t think anyone deserves racism. I’d rather he face no racism than any, so long as it means there’s no racism being faced by non bigoted people either.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

I do agree with pretty much all that you’re saying. Especially the part that ideally, we are all human and human suffering (like experiencing racism) should be minimized.

Maybe it’s my age, but I guess I assume there will always be bigots and bad actors out there, yes we should actively fight to minimize it, but at the same time, after all those minimization efforts, we should still want and expect people to have critical thinking.

I guess even though bad actors aren’t good to have, I view them as almost a necessary evil (similar to how a bear is part of the ecosystem) so people learn about evil and critical thinking. Having said that, we are have waaaaaay more bad actors today than necessary.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

When a bear is eating your face you dab his chin with a napkin is the other guys point.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

Perhaps he will realize that his entire organization is filled with shitty people... nah

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Crazy if true. I'm curious about what the result of the lawsuit will be.

load more comments
view more: next ›