Mildly Infuriating
Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.
I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!
It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
7. Content should match the theme of this community.
-Content should be Mildly infuriating.
-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.
...
8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.
-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.
...
...
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.
That's kind of funny actually. The don't want the homeless so they just ban the homeless. Talk about sticking your head in the sand.
So what happens if you try to sleep outside? Do the cops pick you up and bring you to a shelter where they provide a bed, meals, and a roommate named Bubba who thinks you're purdy?
Conservatives are so short sighted - this is just giving handouts with extra hands and limited humanity.
Wait till you read about "crime free housing"
The point isn't to get rid of homelessness, but to get rid of the homeless within their communities.
That's probably exactly what happens. Or they get a bus ticket to the nearest big city that does have some services, after which conservatives can rail about how the city has become a hellhole that's full of homeless people.
Did you read the article? The actual details of the program are pretty far from what you say here. Don't have time to bullet point at the moment but please trust me and just take a full look. As someone with deep personal experience around this issue, their method might be a genuine answer to the problem, when properly scaled. Not the first time a plan like theirs has been tried either; Olympia, WA has a similar program for direct outreach.
Since HEART has launched, the county has engaged with roughly 215 people on the street, according to the commissioner.
So in 2 years they spent $3 million dollars to "help" 215 people. And the article is very vague and full of euphemisms that make me suspect they're just pushing them out to Denver.
engaged with roughly 215 people on the street
Key word being "engaged", later they slipped in there that 80% end up not getting "helped"
Yep, handing out a flyer, or even just talking is an engagement. This means nothing.
Did you?
They spent almost $3 million in helping 37 people in 2 years (that's $81,000 a pop) with very vague "getting them help". Very much looks like most of what they do is ship them to out of county
I think you're being intentionally obtuse. The article is anything but vague. Are they supposed to name the exact agencies and businesses involved, or can we reasonably assume that Laydon is referring to state funded assistance? Here's some select bits of the article since you don't want to read.
Douglas County had created a team of experts, known as the “Homeless Engagement, Assistance and Resource Team," to help tackle the issue. The HEART team, as county officials call it, is made up of experts in behavioral health and who are deployed in branded vehicles to help people living on the streets.
Here's how the county handles it. When a report is made about a panhandler or a homeless person, a HEART vehicle is deployed to the area and make an assessment.
Laydon called Douglas County’s approach “housing plus,” which, he said, is a balanced approach to “trauma-informed practices.”
“For us,” Laydon added, “'housing plus' means wraparound. So, it is housing, but it is also food, shelter, job counseling, mental health counseling. It's treating those substance abuse issues that we know often come hand in hand with a lot of the issues that the unhoused face.”
Edit: Additionally, I fail to see the relevance of money spent if it actually results in less people unhoused. Denver spent way more money and ended up with a higher unhoused population than before.
Are they supposed to name the exact agencies and businesses involved
Yes, it's called transparency. Maybe they didn't have to mention them all but a single concrete example would have definitely helped.
But you know what they did repeat in the article? the fact that they are pushing for people not to give money to the homeless directly
Douglas County had created a team of experts, known as the “Homeless Engagement, Assistance and Resource Team," to help tackle the issue. The HEART team, as county officials call it, is made up of experts in behavioral health and who are deployed in branded vehicles to help people living on the streets.
Ok, that sounds like a great start... let's see what they actually do.... <insert crickets here, not a single follow up>
Here’s how the county handles it. When a report is made about a panhandler or a homeless person, a HEART vehicle is deployed to the area and make an assessment.
Yes, they are basically making panhandling illegal... they are very quick to dispatch police (yes the "HEART" team is also the police) as soon as homeless are reported
Laydon called Douglas County’s approach “housing plus,” which, he said, is a balanced approach to “trauma-informed practices.”
Cool, what does that mean? how it is balanced? how is it different?. Zero details = Vague
“For us,” Laydon added, “‘housing plus’ means wraparound. So, it is housing, but it is also food, shelter, job counseling, mental health counseling. It’s treating those substance abuse issues that we know often come hand in hand with a lot of the issues that the unhoused face.”
This one is actually the first sentence from the article that addresses the real question.... yet no mention as to where any of these services are done. They are just shipping people off county The entire $3+ million budget was spent on the "HEART" team to basically find and ship homeless out of county... out of sight out of mind!
Edit: Additionally, I fail to see the relevance of money spent if it actually results in less people unhoused. Denver spent way more money and ended up with a higher unhoused population than before.
So if a county spends $3 million to move 37 homeless people out of county or $10 million to move 1 it's all the same to you? A basic definition of the effectiveness of a social program is to measure that #1 it accomplishes the goal it set out to do and #2 at what cost...
Look, if they are indeed helping the homeless, KUDOS to them. But I'm far past the point to give any public service, specially so the Police, the benefit of doubt. Show me actual measures, concrete examples, verifiable information and I will happily eat my words and applaud. Even the title making it 86% when they meant 37 people in 2 years seems to be a gimmick to make the whole thing look better than it is
AAAAAHHHHH!!!!! Stop being factually correct, but completely wrong!!!
This is a MUCH better use of Taxpayer Dollars then spending only a FRACTION of that on Sheltering and Rehabilitating the Homeless!
Maybe it's time to get started with local politics. Not saying run for city council, but most local issues are done because a very bored minority go to a lot of council meetings. Maybe it's time to start going and showing that not everybody agrees
"He said no, Err.....with his foot."