this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science

15557 readers
15 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

At more or less they explain why this claim is not true: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/w3ct5tqj

The original study claims 0.1-5g/week of plastic dependent on the diet. The BBC expert says they overestimate this range a lot due to their methodology.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Well that's a bit more encouraging, although as they say at the end the real question is how many small particles we consume that can get into the blood stream instead of passing through the system.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

You know what, I thought the average would be higher, I feel a bit better. Not much though.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

On a good week I'll eat two!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

what-the-hell starting to feel like all this plastic business might not be good for the long term health of the planet

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The planet is fine, it will be fine long after we are gone.

It is our civilization is seems to be fucked.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Sure but I'm including the biosphere as a part of the planet. Rocks are cool and all but life is much cooler imo