UK Politics

3063 readers

139 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Political figures who bet on election date will not face police charges, Met says (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The key bit is:

“Based on the assessment of the evidence and the advice from the CPS, it was determined that the high bar for misconduct in public office to be proven was not met,” it added.

It was always going to be tricky getting them on this charge but the Gambling Commission just need to prove they were cheating when they placed those bets.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

What does

high bar for misconduct in public office

actually mean? Do they have to murder and skull fuck someone on live TV or something before the CPS actually investigates?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

misconduct in public office

This seems to be the key bit

“The words “acting as such” plainly mean acting in the discharge of the duties of the office… Misconduct in public office bites on breaches of duties, which constituted the offence itself… the offence will only be made out if the manner in which the specific powers or duties of the office are discharged brings the misconduct within its ambit. Consequently, at the time of the alleged misconduct the individual must be acting as, not simply whilst, a public official… No authority was shown to us suggesting that the offence can be or has been equated to bringing an office into disrepute or misusing a platform outside the scope of the office.”

I imagine its fairly hard to make the case they were acting as MPs while making the bets instead of merely acting while being MPs. The gambling offences seem much more likely to stick.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Yep.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Pretty much.