this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
547 points (98.2% liked)

Work Reform

9994 readers
134 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Paywall removed: https://archive.is/dHH7a

(page 2) 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 64 points 2 months ago

The HR profession’s reputation as pond scum remains intact.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

So there’s employment in the afterlife?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Don't give them ideas. Death is the only escape from work we'll likely have.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago

The one and only time I managed to get scheduled for an interview from an online job application, GMail filed the fucking email as spam! So of course I missed the interview... ☹️

Fuck online job applications!

[–] [email protected] 116 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

It may seem counterproductive for recruiters to advertise ghost jobs, theoretically wasting their own time as well as that of applicants—but there are incentives for doing so. About 38% say they post fake positions to maintain a presence on job boards when they aren’t hiring, 36% do so to assess the effectiveness of their job descriptions, 26% want to build a talent pool for the future, 26% hope gain insight into the job market and competitors, and 25% want to assess how difficult it would be to replace certain employees, according to the report. Escalera points out that a big reason for posting these jobs is recruiters wanting to improve their business’ image—nearly a quarter also say that fake jobs help their companies look as if they aren’t experiencing a hiring freeze, and one fifth say they post ghost jobs to improve the reputation of their company.

Way to validate our feelings about you, recruiters.

Edit: I'd like to see legislation that goes after "truth in advertising" in this area. This should be illegal. It wastes peoples' time.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Those numbers add up to 151%

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago

They're independent stats. You can both assess the effectiveness of your job descriptions and see how difficult it would be to replace certain employees.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 171 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I keep banging on about how hiring practices need to be reformed, and stopping this shit should be the first thing on the agenda

[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Start by paying interviewees the wage of the job posted for their time interviewing and doing "tests"

These fuckers spend bajillions on HR software and HR execs, surely they can figure out how to hire quality candidates at a more efficient clip?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 2 months ago (12 children)

There is no agenda for the benefit of working people.

Corpos do this on purpose to tired out the wage slaves with bull shit.

Best we can do is to educate ourselves and avoid these idiotic games.

Middle levels and senior people can start doing this today.

Entry level, well young people act like this is the first time this has happened in history but I can tell you that entry level has been bloodbath since early 1990s.

But once you get some grip, start acting like you respect yourself

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›