No it is not a threat. To tell somebody that you're willing to defend yourself and your rights with violence is only a threat to those who will take them. It's a secondary reaction not a primary action.
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
1110 points (97.6% liked)
People Twitter
7012 readers
1892 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It's not even an empty threat here, he has killed and he will kill again
load more comments
(2 replies)
Hey, Tampon? Tim?
Yeah, to me it reads like wee Kyle was just being polite and offering Tim Walz some of it's spare feminine hygiene products.
load more comments
(4 replies)
Walz’s stance isn’t even that restrictive. He’s signed bills for better background checks, which is pretty reasonable. We have background checks for all kinds of other dangerous situations, its not a new concept or a difficult thing to pass. He’s signed a bill to remove guns from those who pose a danger to themselves or others. Is Rittenhouse implying here that he poses a danger to himself or the general public? If Walz’s policies should take the guns away from Rittenhouse then that’s what I get out of this. Kyle is acknowledging, even advertising, that he is a continued danger to those around him.
load more comments
(2 replies)
