this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
484 points (96.9% liked)

World News

38930 readers
2074 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It may be the first time a drone has destroyed a helicopter in mid-air.

Ukrainian forces deploy more than 100,000 explosive first-person-view drones a month all along the 700-mile front line of Russia’s 28-month wider war on Ukraine. The drones smash into armored vehicles, chase down exposed infantry and follow artillery fire back to its origin in order to target Russian howitzers.

And today one of the small quadcopter drones—remotely steered by an operator wearing a virtual-reality headset—shot down a Russian helicopter, apparently for the first time.

Photos and videos that circulated on social media depict the Mil Mi-8 transport helicopter burning near Donetsk in Russian-occupied eastern Ukraine. “A speedy recovery to the survivors,” one Russian blogger wrote.

This new use of explosive drones has been a long time coming. As long ago as September, Ukrainian operators first tried ramming their flying robots into Russian helicopters mid-flight. The drone threat got so serious that the Russian air force began assigning some helicopters to escort other helicopters.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Fuck the smelly orcs and vatniks as always.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

The only winners in this war have been the Chinese drone part makers on Alibaba and the intermediaries in the Middle East/Central Asia buying those parts and reselling them to Ukraine/Russia.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

i cant wait until actual war machine countries start producing the drone swarm en masse. (this is sarcasm)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well congratulations you already waited long enough. The US is producing them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

yayyy cant wait til im swarmed after an AI thinks im gonna commit a crime

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The Russian military has hundreds of helicopters and, so far, has lost just a hundred or so to Ukrainian action.

Odd use of "only". Based on that sentence alone, they've lost between 10% and 90%, which sounds like a lot..

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

Not to mention, if they’re anything like their fighters or their tanks, only a small fraction was really in operational condition, the rest stored for parts.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I'm just waiting for someone to use one of these for an assassination attempt in a western country. I'm honestly surprised it hasn't happened yet considering Ukraine has shown how effective they are.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Imagine if that guy who tried to shoot trump, actually used a drone. I don't know how these things work, but I assume they have more than 1 missile per drone. So then imagine he just opened fire on a large scale crowd.

And because it's a drone, he could be like 2 miles away. With the right escape plan, he could have been in Mexico long before anyone ever traced it back to him.

From Mexico, he could move pretty much anywhere with an alias.

He could have committed a large scale terrorist attack, AND gotten away with it. At least for a while. I mean, even Bin Laden EVENTUALLY was found.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's not really how they use these drones, or how you would use a drone to assassinate someone. For the case of Trump you'd use a FPV drone that weights maybe 750 grams and can lift an extra 400gramms of whatever payload. And then you just kamikaze it into the target. It's pretty easy and cheap. A drone like that if you build it yourself is maybe 250 bucks on the low end and maybe 400 for a long range drone. These things are fast as fuck and you can be a good km away from the target. If you are even a mediocre pilot it's pretty hard to miss. I don't know shit about explosives, and how you would make it go boom, but just flying a 500g drone into someone's face at 100kmh surely sends a message.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If you are even a mediocre pilot it's pretty hard to miss.

Ever fly fpv?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Mediocre" can be a relative term. I would call myself a "mediocre" runner, because I run a handful of times a week and can beat most people on a 3000m, but am eons away from the pros. A "mediocre" fpv pilot can be someone who flies regularly and who most people would look at and consider "really good", but who is still far from being a pro.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Fair point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

It was a fairly wide bore target though. The only reason he missed was because of the range. With a Drone it would be point blank.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

He did use a drone a few hours before the attempt but only to get an overview

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Be careful what you "wish" for.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Not wishing at all. As soon as it happens, they'll outlaw all drones. They won't be covered under the 2nd amendment of course.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I would be absolutely astonished if as part of the no-fly zone established at these rallies that they don't have frequency jammers at the very minimum.

I feel it's only a matter of time before they put a plexiglass bunker surrounding the president at the very least.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

For that rally they didn't have it. It's in the report. And yes the entire security world spit their coffee out when we found that out.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

We're getting to the point where even a frequency jammer might not stop an AI piloted drone. Just teach the drone what a 'rally' looks like and where the target typically stands, and then launch it. No radio or GPS signals required.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I was reading a company in Ukraine has completed a functioning drone that does just this. Basically permits it to fire-and-forget as it has basic optimal image recognition built into a chip. Crazy.

Alternatively if you knew the target's static location, you could bypass GPS and controller jamming by utilizing good 'ol fashioned orienteering principles with an accelerometer, compass, and provided coordinates.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

All of the public events now have some heavy anti drone measures set up. Like the Olympics currently.

I'm not sure how this works as they often rely on drones for filming though. So it's not jamming.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Possibly whitelisted frequencies that must hop in a certain pattern to avoid jamming?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Consumer drones already exist, that can recognize you by face and follow you.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They won't be covered under the 2nd amendment of COurse.

What if I strap a gun? Then it's patriotic and family friendly!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago

I have a constitutional right to glue an Uzi to a quadcopter to protect my GMC Sierra

load more comments
view more: next ›