Again, they're not stuck, neither indefinitely nor definitely. The return was on hold to give NASA time to study the equipment before it was jettisoned to burn up in atmosphere. They still have resources (power, water, food, air, etc.) in reserve to last a while longer before they have to leave. (And I'm pretty sure that NASA could resupply them anyway.)
this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
70 points (80.2% liked)
News
23296 readers
3197 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
They're having a blast too. It's even possible this will be the last trip both of them take to ISS.
You are correct; thank you for bringing rationality to something that the media continues to sensationalize.
I know I'm arguing semantics here and the rest of your post is probably right but if they unexpectedly don't have a way to get home right now I think that qualifies as stuck. If there's no set date where that's scheduled to change yet they are stuck indefinitely.
They do have a way to get home right now, safely. Their mission was simply changed to staying up longer.
That's good to hear, in that case I was wrong and I withdraw my objection.
Sustained 👨⚖️
The part of the spacecraft that has the issue they're researching is the part that has already done its job (getting to the space station). That part isn't needed for the flight home, and in fact, gets jettisoned not long after departure from the station. Thats the reason they haven't left yet. If they leave, the part of the spacecraft with the problem gets thrown away and they can't learn anything more from it.
Is that correct? I thought the simulations being run were to determine if the leaks posed any potential risk during separation, and triple checked multiple times to ensure safety. I didn't consider it was for data collection
if you say "sorry i'm stuck at work" it doesn't mean that your boss has literally chained you in place
Indefinitely implies never being able to go back which is much more similar to your analogy though. Either way, it's clearly a click bait headline.
No, indefinitely implies you don't know when you'll be able to go back. It does not mean you're never going back.