this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
341 points (90.5% liked)

politics

19050 readers
3887 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Imo we need an all woman ticket. If we can't get that then we need someone from a swing state to potentially tip the scales there.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Sharice Davids?

That would be a fun ticket.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I vote for policies not people. I don’t care if the candidate is a green-skinned genetically-enhanced three-year-old clone of a dead woman from Ohio, with a biotech computer in her brain. As long as she supports equal rights for all humans, I’m on board.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Knights of Symphonia is an excellent manga.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

I don’t know what that is. I was referencing “Old Man’s War” by John Scalzi. An excellent book series.

[–] [email protected] 82 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I actually really like buttigieg, but he's wrong. A woman of color AND a gay man? I wish we lived in that country but we don't live in that country.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yep, maybe after boomers and gen x have died off sure, but this country is still battling itself on lgbtq rights.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Can any of you buttigeg naysayers elaborate?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 months ago

Not you, Gay Nixon.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Still waiting for Americans to be ready for a Trans Atheist Single Childless Woman of Color President.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Buttigieg is quite ambitious

[–] [email protected] 61 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Honestly, I’d settle for a good one. Gay or not. Because a person’s sexuality and preferences are entirely irrelevant to one’s ability to be a fair and hard working representative.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

Is america ready for a competent president? Will voters accept an adequate candidate? Its hard to say, without knowing first which divisive and inflammatory categories they can be sorted into.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago

...that's kinda what he's saying. He's saying there's enough people who agree with this now that the political backlash to it will be a drop of hate in a huge bucket of sensible sentiments.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Let's not pretend that people would refuse to vote for a gay candidate.

Whether we personally consider it an issue it has likely massively hurt their prospects as a politician.

Also representation is really important. Especially for younger people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I’ve never in my life voted for someone because they were a heterosexual. I vote based on their track record. When we stop giving a shit about what people do with their genitals, we will be better off. We don’t need gender identity representation in our politics- we just need someone that will treat all people as equals- and enact policy that reflects this.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

When we stop giving a shit about what people do with their genitals, we will be better off.

(From the people who brought you “JD Vance fucks couches”.)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Unless he himself has been saying that, you're painting with too broad a brush. We aren't all accountable for what our political allies do. Thank fuck. There are plenty of people on the left with more enthusiasm than ability to reason and communicate in public.

And I say that appreciating the irony that I will hold republicans accountable for allowing Nazis in their midst. But the difference to me is they don't speak out. Some of us will call out the left on bullshit (e.g. Gaza) even if we share similar ultimate goals. I see very few on the right ever do that.

Also, Vance fucks furniture is sort of obvious humor that no one takes really seriously, anyway, so probably not worth tackling that as a serious subject.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Again you might not but plenty of people would. I would say it's a pretty large crowd as well.

Also sexuality has nothing to do with gender.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

When we stop giving a shit about what people do with their genitals,

This is not how international politics work. Can you think for a second of the optics on the world stage? The us isn’t some international flyover state equivalent like Iceland. If Harris steps down and Buttigeg needs to meet with someone in the Middle East how do you think that meeting is going to go over? The US is a big fish and this is like, unprecedented for a world power this huge.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I imagine it would go something like this:

Hello Mr President welcome to my country.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Exactly. It would be an incredible way to push forward lgbt+ rights. I'd prefer a candidate with good politics, but I'd be lying if I didn't like the idea of how it would ruffle bigots... But Harris's main goal is to get elected.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But, are they ready for a VP that has only been mayor of a small town and a cabinet member four years?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They were ready for a President who had only been a failed businessman and a game show host, so probably yes?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Different they. You two are talking about different groups of people. Kamalas path to victory isn't doing what Trump voters approve of, it's doing what people who don't like Trump approve of.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›